Courier company UPS stopped delivering packages in the multicultural district of Rosengård in Malmö.
United Parcel Service Inc. started as a courier company in the United States in 1907 and has grown into a multi-billion dollar company. Every day, UPS handles goods, money and information in more than 200 countries and regions worldwide.
One area that currently does not receive packages is the multicultural district of Rosengård in Malmö.
UPS confirms that they no longer deliver to the area because the risk of being subjected to robbery and other crimes is too high. “Our drivers have been attacked and we have therefore decided not to distribute packages in Rosengård”, says a customer service employee.
The decision was made two months ago. Similar stops have been introduced in areas in Stockholm. And according to UPS, the new terms will remain in place as long as drivers are at risk of being attacked.
However, according to the Swedish police and left-wing politicians there are no “no-go zones” in Sweden. Only 61 “vulnerable areas”, which need prioritising and more attention from the police. 23 of these areas are identified as “particularly vulnerable.” Another handful are deemed to be in the “risk zone”.
Several of them are basically run by criminals and the police cannot carry out their job. Car fires, grenade attacks and bombings occur almost daily. Police, firefighters and ambulance workers are attacked by migrants and prevented from doing their job on a regular basis.
The situation has gotten so bad that ambulance unions have put forth requests for bullet proof vests to be given to paramedics operating in the problematic areas.
The bombing of a police station in Helsingborg recently was described by Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Löfven as an “attack” on democracy itself.
In the migrant-majority town of Södertälje, a police station was shot at ten times overnight, though no officers were present at the station at the time.
Many such attacks have been captured on surveillance and other cameras and are widely available to be seen online. Footage from 2015 shows police officers being attacked while others are shouting “you are not in charge here” to them.
Four stations in Stockholm Metro have become so dangerous for personnel that they are only able to perform their duties with the help of extra police.
Parking attendants are being chased away or attacked. Thus parking companies cannot guarantee for their employees safety.
The government-owned postal service PostNord has halted mail delivery to some addresses near the troubled Stockholm suburb of Rinkeby.
And now UPS stops delivering packages to certain areas.
The definition of “no-go zone” is “a region where the ruling authorities have lost control and are unable to enforce the rule of law”. Which means that there without a doubt are no-go zones in Sweden – and that Swedish politicians and police are flat-out lying.
Thursday, 28 February 2019
Monday, 25 February 2019
Wireless Technology Is Lowering Testosterone Levels
Electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs) emitted from many examples of modern technology may be a major overlooked factor in the sharp decline of male serum testosterone levels in the past few decades as well as a factor in numerous other negative health effects. Could EMF exposure be the next smoking equivalent? The evidence shows this to be the case.
It's perhaps no coincidence that over the last 30 years, testosterone levels have been dropping at the same time as EMF levels in the environment have been rising.
You can eat right, exercise right, have positive health habits; but our exposure to EMFs is almost inevitable in modern society, and it's only getting worse as the increasingly biologically invasive millimeter-wave 5G gets rolled out throughout most of the developed world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toYAeBe7e0s
It is an accurate statement to call EMF exposure a near-castration, or even an effective castration of men. Especially with most men having their cellphones in their pockets in close proximity to their testes.
Why is this?
Testosterone is synthesized and produced by the Leydig cells of the testes; at a higher frequency, specifically 2.45 GHz, an EMF induced a decrease in the Leydig cell number and increase of apoptosis-positive cells in the seminiferous tubules of Wistar rats, this likely has a similar effect in humans. What we learn here is that if the Leydig cells are destroyed, so is the man. Rendered sexually ineffective due to his lack or complete absence of testosterone.
Why isn't this common knowledge?
EMFs are too profitable an industry to scientifically undermine. Facts struggle to speak louder than money.
The telecoms industry lobbies governments and regulatory agencies to align with their scientific account of the realities surrounding EMFs. There's likely an underpinning depopulation agenda keeping this all afloat, too.
The studies.
Despite these facts not being common knowledge, nearly 100 published studies dating back to 1971, including by the Naval Medical Research Institute, show the negative effects of electromagnetic radiation on the male testes (where testosterone is produced), including damage to testicular function, abnormal hormonal function, DNA breakages on sperm, and even cell death.
The evidence for EMFs causing human subfertility and infertility is significant.
To put the seriousness of the issue in perspective, a study conducted in 2005 and replicated multiple times showed extremely low frequency (50Hz) radiation like that emitted by power lines caused major damage to the inner structures of testicles in rats:
In the experimental rats, boundary tissue was found disrupted at various layers. That tissue showed infoldings, which were perhaps due to the loss of collagen and reticular fibrils from the inner and outer non-cellular layers.
The outer non-cellular layer, which was thinner than that of the control, was stripped away from the myoid cell layer in multiple regions, giving a "blister-like" appearance. The myoid cells showed fewer polyribosomes, pinocytotic vesicles and glycogen granules.
Most mitochondria were found to lack cristae. The connections between individual myoid cells were apparently lost. There were signs of recovery in the boundary tissue following withdrawal from EMF exposure.
A study from the Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction looked at low frequency electromagnetic fields long-term exposure effects on testicular histology, sperm quality and testosterone levels of male rats.
The results of the study were clear and damning: Long-term exposure to low frequency EMF significantly decreased the diameter of the seminiferous tubules and increased number of seminiferous tubules per unit area of testes. In addition, low frequency EMF significantly reduced sperm motility and testosterone levels. However, it had no effect on the weight and size of testes, sperm concentration, and viability.
A human example of these effects can be seen in a study called "Effects of electromagnetic fields on serum lipids in workers of a power plant". The study found that workers exposed to high magnetic fields in a power plant had reduced levels of testosterone.
There's also evidence EMFs interfere with sleep cycles, creates permeability of the blood brain barrier, and interferes with the function of the pituitary gland, which is responsible for hormonal secretion.
One study concluded that through in vitro and in vivo studies, EMF exposure was found to alter the reproductive endocrine hormones, gonadal function, embryonic development, pregnancy, and fetal development. These effects were different according to the frequency, duration of exposure, and strength of EMFs. Humans in modern society cannot avoid various kinds of EMFs during household and occupational activities, but should be aware of the biological hazard of EMFs. The effort to avoid EMF exposure and techniques to protect or relieve EMF radiation are required to preserve our reproductive potential.
A recommended resource:
I recommend this book written on the subject: "The Non-Tinfoil Guide to EMFs: How to Fix Our Stupid Use of Technology" by Nicolas Pineault.
Here's the book description:
Can you really feel years younger & make unexplained symptoms vanish with the click of a button — the “Airplane Mode” on your cell phone?
Investigative Health Journalist Nicolas Pineault used to think this all sounded like something only crazy people wearing tinfoil hats would say.
But the overwhelming amount of independent scientific evidence linking electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from wireless technologies with increased risks of cancer, infertility, insomnia, and depression sure has the uncanny ability to change a man’s mind.
The Non-Tinfoil Guide to EMFs is a simple and unconventional book that will teach you exactly how to reduce your exposure to this brand new 21st-century pollution without going back to the Stone Age.
You will learn:
It’s true. The jury is still out about whether cellphone radiation is the new smoking or just a temporary scare. But why take chances?
Instead, read The Non-Tinfoil Guide to EMFs — the technological seat belt you might just need to use your new gadgets safely.
Visit the official website.
Another resource is this article, that I've found covers most - if not all - the important considerations in protecting your hormonal profile and reproductive health.
It's perhaps no coincidence that over the last 30 years, testosterone levels have been dropping at the same time as EMF levels in the environment have been rising.
You can eat right, exercise right, have positive health habits; but our exposure to EMFs is almost inevitable in modern society, and it's only getting worse as the increasingly biologically invasive millimeter-wave 5G gets rolled out throughout most of the developed world.
- Since WWII, the incidence of testicular cancer has quadrupled;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toYAeBe7e0s
It is an accurate statement to call EMF exposure a near-castration, or even an effective castration of men. Especially with most men having their cellphones in their pockets in close proximity to their testes.
Why is this?
Testosterone is synthesized and produced by the Leydig cells of the testes; at a higher frequency, specifically 2.45 GHz, an EMF induced a decrease in the Leydig cell number and increase of apoptosis-positive cells in the seminiferous tubules of Wistar rats, this likely has a similar effect in humans. What we learn here is that if the Leydig cells are destroyed, so is the man. Rendered sexually ineffective due to his lack or complete absence of testosterone.
Why isn't this common knowledge?
EMFs are too profitable an industry to scientifically undermine. Facts struggle to speak louder than money.
The telecoms industry lobbies governments and regulatory agencies to align with their scientific account of the realities surrounding EMFs. There's likely an underpinning depopulation agenda keeping this all afloat, too.
The studies.
Despite these facts not being common knowledge, nearly 100 published studies dating back to 1971, including by the Naval Medical Research Institute, show the negative effects of electromagnetic radiation on the male testes (where testosterone is produced), including damage to testicular function, abnormal hormonal function, DNA breakages on sperm, and even cell death.
The evidence for EMFs causing human subfertility and infertility is significant.
To put the seriousness of the issue in perspective, a study conducted in 2005 and replicated multiple times showed extremely low frequency (50Hz) radiation like that emitted by power lines caused major damage to the inner structures of testicles in rats:
In the experimental rats, boundary tissue was found disrupted at various layers. That tissue showed infoldings, which were perhaps due to the loss of collagen and reticular fibrils from the inner and outer non-cellular layers.
The outer non-cellular layer, which was thinner than that of the control, was stripped away from the myoid cell layer in multiple regions, giving a "blister-like" appearance. The myoid cells showed fewer polyribosomes, pinocytotic vesicles and glycogen granules.
Most mitochondria were found to lack cristae. The connections between individual myoid cells were apparently lost. There were signs of recovery in the boundary tissue following withdrawal from EMF exposure.
A study from the Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction looked at low frequency electromagnetic fields long-term exposure effects on testicular histology, sperm quality and testosterone levels of male rats.
The results of the study were clear and damning: Long-term exposure to low frequency EMF significantly decreased the diameter of the seminiferous tubules and increased number of seminiferous tubules per unit area of testes. In addition, low frequency EMF significantly reduced sperm motility and testosterone levels. However, it had no effect on the weight and size of testes, sperm concentration, and viability.
A human example of these effects can be seen in a study called "Effects of electromagnetic fields on serum lipids in workers of a power plant". The study found that workers exposed to high magnetic fields in a power plant had reduced levels of testosterone.
There's also evidence EMFs interfere with sleep cycles, creates permeability of the blood brain barrier, and interferes with the function of the pituitary gland, which is responsible for hormonal secretion.
One study concluded that through in vitro and in vivo studies, EMF exposure was found to alter the reproductive endocrine hormones, gonadal function, embryonic development, pregnancy, and fetal development. These effects were different according to the frequency, duration of exposure, and strength of EMFs. Humans in modern society cannot avoid various kinds of EMFs during household and occupational activities, but should be aware of the biological hazard of EMFs. The effort to avoid EMF exposure and techniques to protect or relieve EMF radiation are required to preserve our reproductive potential.
A recommended resource:
I recommend this book written on the subject: "The Non-Tinfoil Guide to EMFs: How to Fix Our Stupid Use of Technology" by Nicolas Pineault.
Here's the book description:
Can you really feel years younger & make unexplained symptoms vanish with the click of a button — the “Airplane Mode” on your cell phone?
Investigative Health Journalist Nicolas Pineault used to think this all sounded like something only crazy people wearing tinfoil hats would say.
But the overwhelming amount of independent scientific evidence linking electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from wireless technologies with increased risks of cancer, infertility, insomnia, and depression sure has the uncanny ability to change a man’s mind.
The Non-Tinfoil Guide to EMFs is a simple and unconventional book that will teach you exactly how to reduce your exposure to this brand new 21st-century pollution without going back to the Stone Age.
You will learn:
- What your smartphone, your wifi router and your microwave oven have in common (page 9)
- Why policy makers and scientists all worldwide don’t agree about whether EMFs are dangerous or not (page 21)
- Is Electro-Hypersensitivity as popularized in the TV show “Better Call Saul” real? Or is it all psychological? (page 62)
- Why carrying a cell phone in your pocket can harm your fertility (201 studies prove it) (page 72)
- The 1-click fix to reduce cellphone EMFs by 84% (page 142)
- What is safer? Speakerphone, earbuds or a Bluetooth ear piece? (page 155)
- The #1 worst source of EMF radiation at home (page 160)
- Why baby monitors are worse than smartphones, and better alternatives (page 208)
It’s true. The jury is still out about whether cellphone radiation is the new smoking or just a temporary scare. But why take chances?
Instead, read The Non-Tinfoil Guide to EMFs — the technological seat belt you might just need to use your new gadgets safely.
Visit the official website.
“I have read nearly all the EMF books out there and The Non-Tinfoil Guide to EMFs is clearly the most practical and useful. It contains everything you need to protect yourself from this 21st century pervasive and pernicious toxic exposure. This book can literally help save your life.
— Dr. Mercola, Founder of Mercola.com, the #1 most visited natural health site
Another resource is this article, that I've found covers most - if not all - the important considerations in protecting your hormonal profile and reproductive health.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr Explains How Big Pharma Completely Owns Congress
Article from Virutron Research.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr, Chairman of the Board of Directors for Children’s Health Defence (a worthy cause if you’re looking for one to donate to) has been fighting against big corporations that have taken over and undermined American government health regulatory agencies for a number of years. One of the most recent examples is when Robert F. Kennedy Jr represented Dewayne Johnson, a school groundskeeper who successfully brought forward a lawsuit alleging glyphosate caused his cancer. That’s right, he won!
There are currently thousands of cases pending against Monsanto, which is only one of multiple powerful companies influencing agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). And to think, these are the agencies providing us with ‘science’ in order to get the food, medications, and other products produced by these big corporations to be deemed safe. Not only that, but these agencies are providing educational resources to medical schools, which Big Pharma has completely taken over as well.
https://youtu.be/w9y-OTaJPOQ
It’s truly unbelievable that, in this day and age, education has turned into brainwashing. Science is corrupted, altered, changed, ignored, and swept under the rug just because it threatens the interests of a few powerful people and the corporations they hide behind.
Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s pesticide Round Up, is a perfect example, as science has been showing for decades how incredibly harmful it is for human health and the environment, yet it’s approved as ‘safe’ for use in the western world. It’s no mystery why glyphosate is illegal in the majority of countries around the world. The same goes for genetically modified foods, which is what Round Up was designed to be used on. Years ago, a lawsuit forced the FDA to divulge its files on genetically engineered foods.
You can read more about that here. You can also read more about the connection between GMOs and cancer as well as hundreds of scientists supporting the link here. Just like glyphosate, dozens of countries have cited health and environmental hazards for keeping GMOs out of their country.
In addition, Monsanto colluded with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to stifle cancer research and any connections to their products. The European Union actually just approved the use of glyphosate, and their approval was found to be based on plagiarized science from Monsanto.
The corruption is never-ending when it comes to the link between corporations and government agencies. In fact, only a few years ago, more than a dozen scientists from within the CDC put out an anonymous public statement detailing the influence corporations have on government policies. They were referred to as the Spider Papers.
Dr. William Thompson is a longtime CDC scientist who has published some of the most commonly cited pro-vaccine studies, some of which claim that there is absolutely no link between the MMR vaccine and autism. He pointed to a specific study that he co-authored in 2004 for the CDC, which claimed that “the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine does not cause autism or any particular subtypes of autism spectrum disorder.” This study is often cited when trying to justify the use of this vaccine, despite the fact that he later stated they deleted important findings from that study. He said that “it’s the lowest point in my career that I went along with that paper and uh, I went along with this, we didn’t report significant findings… I’m completely ashamed of what I did, I have great shame now that I was complicit and went along with this. I have been a part of the problem.” (source)
Anxious to get this information out, Thompson sent various documents to Congressman Bill Posey, who addressed the congress, reading a statement that he had received from Dr. Thompson:
As you can see, there are no shortage of examples that highlight the collusion between corporations and government regulatory agencies.
The Takeaway
This information might come as a shock for some, and to those of you who are just waking up to this kind of thing, it’s really nothing to be scared about. This is simply important information to be aware of. Once you are aware, you can make more informed decisions and better choices in your own life. After all, who are the main resources for these big, misleading corporations? Us. We are the ones who use and support their products and keep the money flowing into their pockets. Without us, they are nothing, which is why awareness is so important.
Sure, there are mass brainwashing campaigns by these companies in an attempt to convince us that their propaganda is real, but more people are becoming aware and it’s spreading across the globe. This can’t go on forever, and compared to a couple of decades ago, so many more people were unaware. We’ve come a long way, and that’s a very positive thing.
Source: Collective Evolution
“Those of you who have been involved in the past in the battle to protect our children from poorly made vaccines or toxic chemicals in our food or in our water know the power of these industries and how they’ve undermined every institution in our democracy that is supposed to protect little children from powerful, greedy corporations. Even the pharmaceutical companies have been able to purchase congress. They’re the largest lobbying entity in Washington D.C.. They have more lobbyists in Washington D.C. than there are congressman and senators combined. They give twice to congress what the next largest lobbying entity is, which is oil and gas… Imagine the power they exercise over both republicans and democrats. They’ve captured them (our regulatory agencies) and turned them into sock puppets. They’ve compromised the press… and they destroy the publications that publish real science. ” – (Robert F. Kennedy Jr, from the video below)
Robert F. Kennedy Jr, Chairman of the Board of Directors for Children’s Health Defence (a worthy cause if you’re looking for one to donate to) has been fighting against big corporations that have taken over and undermined American government health regulatory agencies for a number of years. One of the most recent examples is when Robert F. Kennedy Jr represented Dewayne Johnson, a school groundskeeper who successfully brought forward a lawsuit alleging glyphosate caused his cancer. That’s right, he won!
There are currently thousands of cases pending against Monsanto, which is only one of multiple powerful companies influencing agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). And to think, these are the agencies providing us with ‘science’ in order to get the food, medications, and other products produced by these big corporations to be deemed safe. Not only that, but these agencies are providing educational resources to medical schools, which Big Pharma has completely taken over as well.
https://youtu.be/w9y-OTaJPOQ
It’s truly unbelievable that, in this day and age, education has turned into brainwashing. Science is corrupted, altered, changed, ignored, and swept under the rug just because it threatens the interests of a few powerful people and the corporations they hide behind.
It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” Dr. Marcia Angell, a physician and longtime Editor-in-Chief of the New England Medical Journal (NEMJ) (source)
Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s pesticide Round Up, is a perfect example, as science has been showing for decades how incredibly harmful it is for human health and the environment, yet it’s approved as ‘safe’ for use in the western world. It’s no mystery why glyphosate is illegal in the majority of countries around the world. The same goes for genetically modified foods, which is what Round Up was designed to be used on. Years ago, a lawsuit forced the FDA to divulge its files on genetically engineered foods.
“As part of the process, they portrayed the various concerns as merely the ignorant opinions of misinformed individuals – and derided them as not only unscientific, but anti-science. They then set to work to convince the public and government officials, through the dissemination of false information, that there was an overwhelming expert consensus, based on solid evidence, that GMOs were safe.” – Jane Goodall
You can read more about that here. You can also read more about the connection between GMOs and cancer as well as hundreds of scientists supporting the link here. Just like glyphosate, dozens of countries have cited health and environmental hazards for keeping GMOs out of their country.
In addition, Monsanto colluded with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to stifle cancer research and any connections to their products. The European Union actually just approved the use of glyphosate, and their approval was found to be based on plagiarized science from Monsanto.
The corruption is never-ending when it comes to the link between corporations and government agencies. In fact, only a few years ago, more than a dozen scientists from within the CDC put out an anonymous public statement detailing the influence corporations have on government policies. They were referred to as the Spider Papers.
Dr. William Thompson is a longtime CDC scientist who has published some of the most commonly cited pro-vaccine studies, some of which claim that there is absolutely no link between the MMR vaccine and autism. He pointed to a specific study that he co-authored in 2004 for the CDC, which claimed that “the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine does not cause autism or any particular subtypes of autism spectrum disorder.” This study is often cited when trying to justify the use of this vaccine, despite the fact that he later stated they deleted important findings from that study. He said that “it’s the lowest point in my career that I went along with that paper and uh, I went along with this, we didn’t report significant findings… I’m completely ashamed of what I did, I have great shame now that I was complicit and went along with this. I have been a part of the problem.” (source)
Anxious to get this information out, Thompson sent various documents to Congressman Bill Posey, who addressed the congress, reading a statement that he had received from Dr. Thompson:
Sometime soon after the meeting, we decided to exclude reporting any race effects, the [CDC] co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the [MMR vaccine] study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can. (source)
As you can see, there are no shortage of examples that highlight the collusion between corporations and government regulatory agencies.
The Takeaway
This information might come as a shock for some, and to those of you who are just waking up to this kind of thing, it’s really nothing to be scared about. This is simply important information to be aware of. Once you are aware, you can make more informed decisions and better choices in your own life. After all, who are the main resources for these big, misleading corporations? Us. We are the ones who use and support their products and keep the money flowing into their pockets. Without us, they are nothing, which is why awareness is so important.
Sure, there are mass brainwashing campaigns by these companies in an attempt to convince us that their propaganda is real, but more people are becoming aware and it’s spreading across the globe. This can’t go on forever, and compared to a couple of decades ago, so many more people were unaware. We’ve come a long way, and that’s a very positive thing.
Source: Collective Evolution
Vaccine Adjuvant Triggers “Army of Immune System Cells Ready to Attack a Child’s Brain”
Article from Virutron Research.
More doctors have come forward to expose the multiple risks associated with vaccine toxicity and the ethical question of vaccination itself. Some of these doctors have offsprings that are themselves suffering from the effects of vaccination. Below is Edward F. Fogarty, MD‘s experience with vaccines.
PHILOSOPHICAL EXEMPTIONS AS BEHAVIORAL ECONOMIC SIGNALS OF FRAUD
An Open Letter from Edward F. Fogarty, MD
I am a practicing physician with multiple state licenses who has had the privilege of being the Chairman of Radiology at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine for the last 12 years. My pathways of understanding many issues in medicine and law have dovetailed over understandings of fraud in science and medicine. I am associated with a large network of attorneys and physicians who have the best intentions of employing whistleblower statutes and legal leverage where possible to alert our fellow citizens of Federal and State Fraud, Waste and Abuse practices.
Additionally, for full disclosure of a personal understanding of “ethical vaccinomics” issues, I have a son named Riley who was born 16 years ago today and has severe autism. From a metals detoxification standpoint, Riley has an epigenetic risk of neuroimmunologic and neurodevelopmental problems related to metals handling in his body due to Methylene Tetrahydrofolate Reductase genes. Riley has 2 different alleles coding for 2 different protein sequences that are slower methylators than the wild type (normal) MTHFR genes.
From an overview perspective of medicine by way of interacting with every specialty in multiple states, my profession of medical imaging has a unique observational role and its practitioners a unique voice in medical ethics and public health. The profession of radiology relies on a primary principle of ALARA in the protection of public health. This is especially relevant on a developmental continuum in pediatric radiology. This acronym stands for As Low As Reasonably Achievable.
At its core, the ALARA concept imparts the understanding that we should strive to reduce the dose of toxins in our practice of medicine to achieve the therapeutic goals of Interventional Radiology or the goals of Diagnostic Imaging for our colleagues tracking disease via the most advanced machines of modern physics in medicine.
Whether those toxins are purely waveforms, or a mix of waveforms from injected metals (radioisotopes), or a non-radioactive metal such as gadolinium, we must always strive to protect our patients from this genetic and immunologically harmful substances under our Hippocratic Oath.
There are obvious parallels between my pediatric radiology practice and that of general pediatricians with regards to the ALARA ethical principles. These ethical principles transcend state, national and international law. These ethical principles apply to the approaches we should use in philosophical exemptions from any form of mandated medicine by government, especially those heavily influenced by corporations.
Increasingly, vaccine injuries are being diagnosed by the world’s radiology community. The well characterized Autoimmune Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants (ASIA) is often documented in MRI images as Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA). This has resulted in the occupational disability of many healthcare workers around the nation in recent years with the push for 100% compliance in healthcare for the use of influenza vaccines.
This is not only a costly loss of worker productivity, influenza vaccines are a yearly unethical experiment because of the lack of any safety studies on these medical products. Influenza vaccines are distributed within weeks of their development and have repeatedly been found contaminated aftermarket release in the last 20 years. Our national healthcare security through the workforce of physicians, nurses, laboratory and radiology technologists is placed at risk for political espionage even as more vaccines are manufactured in jurisdictions that could use these products as Trojan horses for slow viruses or prions. Epidemiologically, my colleagues in public health, Neurology or Infectious Disease will need years and many exposures to identify a signal if such covert biological warfare is occurring even now.
As an academic physician and multi-state practitioner of radiology working with some of our nation’s researchers in search of answers to the acute neurological crises impacting our country, I have published several neuroimaging statistical analyses of brain injury from metals linked through TBI and dementia. These clinical entities respond to Hyperbaric Medical interventions and have known associations to iron and aluminum exposures to the brain.
My expert witness role in medico-legal venues has also brought forth cases of extrinsically triggered encephalomyelitis temporally related to vaccine administration in previously healthy infants, grade schoolers and high schoolers. These children often have a genetic predisposition to immunologically mediated injuries by poor metal detoxification genetics in methylation and sulfation genes. In some instances, the indiscriminate practice of injecting adjuvants into the wrong tissues such as occurs with SIRVA leads to autoimmunity that does not have an inherent genetic risk signature—these adjuvants can be deposited directly against nerve tissues similar to the joint capsule collagen in SIRVA and cross react with the surface proteins, creating an army of immune system cells ready to attack a child’s own brain.
Bioinformatics involving the study of molecular genetics and homologies or divergences of sequences are a complex subject. My son’s condition rests on the complex interplay of variant genes with the environment. Ironically, my molecular genetics research project at the University of Chicago as an undergraduate exploited the homologies of mice and humans in the sequencing of intermediate filaments by using a cross-species primer hybridization technique to reduce costs and speed the process of sequencing the mouse Keratin 14 gene in the laboratory of Elaine Fuchs, PhD. Mouse models for gene knockout technology or immunologic modeling of human disease are extremely important to our understanding of complex immunological and epigenetic interactions leading to disease.
Our nation’s scientists have long used a mouse model of encephalitis by mixing vaccines with neural tissues from one ground-up mouse brain which is then injected into a living mouse by lumbar puncture techniques; my practice in Interventional radiology includes lumbar punctures in children with suspected meningitis. By this crude adjuvant/antigen complex we can produce an accurate model of acute encephalomyelitis. ADEM in humans is a known listed side effect of vaccination.
One additional insight from the world of animals in the interaction of vaccines with neurological function involves my colleagues who hold the degree of DVM. The veterinary community has a term for failure to thrive after vaccination in young mammals—their profession’s word for this is vaccinosis. Yet this term is never found in the human medical literature.
Mild recurrent encephalitis from trauma with iron is being defined as CTE in our athletes and on MRIs with specific sequences (SWI), capturing the virtual history of this recurrent chronic encephalitis by medical imaging techniques recoding iron/hemosiderin deposits. It is no stretch to suggest that autism in some children may be a complex metals detoxification impairment syndrome from stepwise recurrent encephalitis. This relates to a myriad of environmental toxins such as lead, mercury and aluminum as well as cytokine stimulus from viral illnesses, some being proprietary live infections from a corporation named Merck. Basic immunology and periodic table politics aside, would you as a legislator mandate YOUR OWN participation in a marketplace that has no liability for its products? There is no liability for these products and thus the best real economic mechanism we have left to discern fraud is consumer choice.
Recently, one of my esteemed academic colleagues named Andrew Zimmerman, MD released an affidavit regarding the cover-up of the link between autism and vaccines that has had profound impacts on the children and families of America. I will not go into the full details, however I encourage you to learn more about this serious and frankly criminal suppression of the truth by those in government who do not have brain-injured American children and their families interests’ in mind as their sworn “officers of the court” duties might imply. Legal malpractice has clearly occurred here, resulting in the institutionalized denial of any association between brain injury and vaccination. The irony of the 1986 Childhood Vaccine protection Act is that the law was put into play to protect the vaccine companies from bankruptcy due to product safety issues.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaimed by the UN 12/10/48 and other succeeding international declarations rights to healthcare did not foresee the fraudulent racketeering of the profession of medicine. These charters and proclamations did vow the protection of individuals against state mandated procedures. They still stand as guideposts to why the children of the state of Washington and their families should have the continued ability to opt out of one, some, or even all of the recommended childhood vaccines because the industry has not been transparent with its safety records.
We do not have the ability to easily understand who is at risk of vaccine injury in children, especially our newborns, we pour billions into individualized care of the legislative-age crowd on pharmacogenomic safety studies so that products like Vioxx do not destroy lives of our learned elders. As we have never done anything of the sort in public health and policy for our most developmentally and eugenically vulnerable wildcards of mixed genes in American families, we practice tacit genetic discrimination in the access to public education. Our school budgets are skyrocketing on the increasing numbers of special needs children.
One of the more honest barometers of the neurological health and well-being of our children are these special needs budgets. These committed resources were a miniscule part of major city educational budgets in cities such as Seattle and my hometown of Omaha in the 1970s. I have cousins who grew up in Omaha and are now teachers in Washington. The budgetary canaries-in-the-coal-mine keep pointing to an environmental disaster occurring in our children. This complex environmental stress environment upon our youngest generation has many inputs outside of medicine, but again by ALARA principle, why not investigate better timing of vaccine product innovations for those who continue to choose vaccinations for their children as my family has. The epigenetic influences and stresses on our children are also hitting our elderly with accelerating dementia prevalence and incidence.
What is next in this microenvironmental pollution of our national bloodstreams and vessels of terrestrial seawater capable of ambulation? Will you as legislators upon hearing of the research accumulating in the world’s literature on the acceleration of dementia via aluminum and mercury in the various routes of bodily entry, begin to defend your own right to choose to avoid metals intoxicants to your brain before congregating in the state capitol? Please recognize my home state of North Dakota and my tax dollars have come into play to help your state with an innocuous measles outbreak that can be treated with high dose vitamin A.
Additionally, the root of the behavioral economics problems of marketing vaccines in this day are directly related to smart parents understanding some of the issues of graft in government as well as overt scientific fraud. There are many MDs, PhDs, DVMs, RNs, NPs, JDs, and other professional parents who vaccinated their children as my spouse and I did on schedule only to find all these criminal conundrums after we saw our children fall off a metal-induced immunologically eroded cliff of neurodevelopmental delay.
If removing philosophical exemptions to participation in fraudulent unregulated markets are what your collective actions bring to bear in your state, you may find liabilities that you did not anticipate. I can say this without reservation, the most pervasive molecular crime against humanity in the last 20 years has been the use of aluminum injections on day one of life which have no medical indication. Diagnostic medicine has long ago marked the crime of medical assault on American babies whose mothers’ obstetric laboratory panels have shown millions of times over that they are delivering antibodies against the Hep B vaccine itself to their fetuses. There is no medical indication for a vaccine on day one of life outside of active infection of the mother. The rest of my colleagues in medicine would be sued or lose their license for serial billing of the state or insurance companies on completely worthless un-indicated interventions like Hep B on day one, or for that matter, at 2 months of life.
The State Auditor of North Dakota and I have met to expose wasteful practices like this in medicine to prevent our Great State from paying such fraudulent Medicaid claims. No medical indication, no medicaid funding—simple.
With growing whistleblower cases coming out of the woodwork in scientific fraud are you really ready to cast this lot towards your constituents’ children and families. The U.S. Department of Justice has a case against Merck in Pennsylvania for the scandalous corporate racketeering of scientists that were told to spike the data for mumps to pass the bar of 95% efficacy, ostensibly so that Merck would not lose the monopoly on MMR in this country. I believe you can all see now that the only check and balance in the system against fraud in vaccine science is a public consumer (parents) becoming aware within our nation discourse regarding these issues. Please hold the line on the philosophical exceptions for the greater good of Washington’s political well-being. Forcing your youngest citizens to participate in a fraud and racketeering scheme is a violation of basic human rights. We first need ethical corporate leadership in the vaccine industry before we can trust our genetically-disabled to the gross negligence of entire generations of humans being treated like cattle.
Thank you for your time and attention, may the wisdom of the great decision makers of history help you discern the best for your state regarding philosophical exemptions.
Sincerely,
Dr. Edward F. Fogarty, Illinois, 2/20/19
More doctors have come forward to expose the multiple risks associated with vaccine toxicity and the ethical question of vaccination itself. Some of these doctors have offsprings that are themselves suffering from the effects of vaccination. Below is Edward F. Fogarty, MD‘s experience with vaccines.
PHILOSOPHICAL EXEMPTIONS AS BEHAVIORAL ECONOMIC SIGNALS OF FRAUD
An Open Letter from Edward F. Fogarty, MD
I am a practicing physician with multiple state licenses who has had the privilege of being the Chairman of Radiology at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine for the last 12 years. My pathways of understanding many issues in medicine and law have dovetailed over understandings of fraud in science and medicine. I am associated with a large network of attorneys and physicians who have the best intentions of employing whistleblower statutes and legal leverage where possible to alert our fellow citizens of Federal and State Fraud, Waste and Abuse practices.
Additionally, for full disclosure of a personal understanding of “ethical vaccinomics” issues, I have a son named Riley who was born 16 years ago today and has severe autism. From a metals detoxification standpoint, Riley has an epigenetic risk of neuroimmunologic and neurodevelopmental problems related to metals handling in his body due to Methylene Tetrahydrofolate Reductase genes. Riley has 2 different alleles coding for 2 different protein sequences that are slower methylators than the wild type (normal) MTHFR genes.
From an overview perspective of medicine by way of interacting with every specialty in multiple states, my profession of medical imaging has a unique observational role and its practitioners a unique voice in medical ethics and public health. The profession of radiology relies on a primary principle of ALARA in the protection of public health. This is especially relevant on a developmental continuum in pediatric radiology. This acronym stands for As Low As Reasonably Achievable.
At its core, the ALARA concept imparts the understanding that we should strive to reduce the dose of toxins in our practice of medicine to achieve the therapeutic goals of Interventional Radiology or the goals of Diagnostic Imaging for our colleagues tracking disease via the most advanced machines of modern physics in medicine.
Whether those toxins are purely waveforms, or a mix of waveforms from injected metals (radioisotopes), or a non-radioactive metal such as gadolinium, we must always strive to protect our patients from this genetic and immunologically harmful substances under our Hippocratic Oath.
There are obvious parallels between my pediatric radiology practice and that of general pediatricians with regards to the ALARA ethical principles. These ethical principles transcend state, national and international law. These ethical principles apply to the approaches we should use in philosophical exemptions from any form of mandated medicine by government, especially those heavily influenced by corporations.
Increasingly, vaccine injuries are being diagnosed by the world’s radiology community. The well characterized Autoimmune Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants (ASIA) is often documented in MRI images as Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA). This has resulted in the occupational disability of many healthcare workers around the nation in recent years with the push for 100% compliance in healthcare for the use of influenza vaccines.
This is not only a costly loss of worker productivity, influenza vaccines are a yearly unethical experiment because of the lack of any safety studies on these medical products. Influenza vaccines are distributed within weeks of their development and have repeatedly been found contaminated aftermarket release in the last 20 years. Our national healthcare security through the workforce of physicians, nurses, laboratory and radiology technologists is placed at risk for political espionage even as more vaccines are manufactured in jurisdictions that could use these products as Trojan horses for slow viruses or prions. Epidemiologically, my colleagues in public health, Neurology or Infectious Disease will need years and many exposures to identify a signal if such covert biological warfare is occurring even now.
As an academic physician and multi-state practitioner of radiology working with some of our nation’s researchers in search of answers to the acute neurological crises impacting our country, I have published several neuroimaging statistical analyses of brain injury from metals linked through TBI and dementia. These clinical entities respond to Hyperbaric Medical interventions and have known associations to iron and aluminum exposures to the brain.
My expert witness role in medico-legal venues has also brought forth cases of extrinsically triggered encephalomyelitis temporally related to vaccine administration in previously healthy infants, grade schoolers and high schoolers. These children often have a genetic predisposition to immunologically mediated injuries by poor metal detoxification genetics in methylation and sulfation genes. In some instances, the indiscriminate practice of injecting adjuvants into the wrong tissues such as occurs with SIRVA leads to autoimmunity that does not have an inherent genetic risk signature—these adjuvants can be deposited directly against nerve tissues similar to the joint capsule collagen in SIRVA and cross react with the surface proteins, creating an army of immune system cells ready to attack a child’s own brain.
Bioinformatics involving the study of molecular genetics and homologies or divergences of sequences are a complex subject. My son’s condition rests on the complex interplay of variant genes with the environment. Ironically, my molecular genetics research project at the University of Chicago as an undergraduate exploited the homologies of mice and humans in the sequencing of intermediate filaments by using a cross-species primer hybridization technique to reduce costs and speed the process of sequencing the mouse Keratin 14 gene in the laboratory of Elaine Fuchs, PhD. Mouse models for gene knockout technology or immunologic modeling of human disease are extremely important to our understanding of complex immunological and epigenetic interactions leading to disease.
Our nation’s scientists have long used a mouse model of encephalitis by mixing vaccines with neural tissues from one ground-up mouse brain which is then injected into a living mouse by lumbar puncture techniques; my practice in Interventional radiology includes lumbar punctures in children with suspected meningitis. By this crude adjuvant/antigen complex we can produce an accurate model of acute encephalomyelitis. ADEM in humans is a known listed side effect of vaccination.
One additional insight from the world of animals in the interaction of vaccines with neurological function involves my colleagues who hold the degree of DVM. The veterinary community has a term for failure to thrive after vaccination in young mammals—their profession’s word for this is vaccinosis. Yet this term is never found in the human medical literature.
Mild recurrent encephalitis from trauma with iron is being defined as CTE in our athletes and on MRIs with specific sequences (SWI), capturing the virtual history of this recurrent chronic encephalitis by medical imaging techniques recoding iron/hemosiderin deposits. It is no stretch to suggest that autism in some children may be a complex metals detoxification impairment syndrome from stepwise recurrent encephalitis. This relates to a myriad of environmental toxins such as lead, mercury and aluminum as well as cytokine stimulus from viral illnesses, some being proprietary live infections from a corporation named Merck. Basic immunology and periodic table politics aside, would you as a legislator mandate YOUR OWN participation in a marketplace that has no liability for its products? There is no liability for these products and thus the best real economic mechanism we have left to discern fraud is consumer choice.
Recently, one of my esteemed academic colleagues named Andrew Zimmerman, MD released an affidavit regarding the cover-up of the link between autism and vaccines that has had profound impacts on the children and families of America. I will not go into the full details, however I encourage you to learn more about this serious and frankly criminal suppression of the truth by those in government who do not have brain-injured American children and their families interests’ in mind as their sworn “officers of the court” duties might imply. Legal malpractice has clearly occurred here, resulting in the institutionalized denial of any association between brain injury and vaccination. The irony of the 1986 Childhood Vaccine protection Act is that the law was put into play to protect the vaccine companies from bankruptcy due to product safety issues.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaimed by the UN 12/10/48 and other succeeding international declarations rights to healthcare did not foresee the fraudulent racketeering of the profession of medicine. These charters and proclamations did vow the protection of individuals against state mandated procedures. They still stand as guideposts to why the children of the state of Washington and their families should have the continued ability to opt out of one, some, or even all of the recommended childhood vaccines because the industry has not been transparent with its safety records.
We do not have the ability to easily understand who is at risk of vaccine injury in children, especially our newborns, we pour billions into individualized care of the legislative-age crowd on pharmacogenomic safety studies so that products like Vioxx do not destroy lives of our learned elders. As we have never done anything of the sort in public health and policy for our most developmentally and eugenically vulnerable wildcards of mixed genes in American families, we practice tacit genetic discrimination in the access to public education. Our school budgets are skyrocketing on the increasing numbers of special needs children.
One of the more honest barometers of the neurological health and well-being of our children are these special needs budgets. These committed resources were a miniscule part of major city educational budgets in cities such as Seattle and my hometown of Omaha in the 1970s. I have cousins who grew up in Omaha and are now teachers in Washington. The budgetary canaries-in-the-coal-mine keep pointing to an environmental disaster occurring in our children. This complex environmental stress environment upon our youngest generation has many inputs outside of medicine, but again by ALARA principle, why not investigate better timing of vaccine product innovations for those who continue to choose vaccinations for their children as my family has. The epigenetic influences and stresses on our children are also hitting our elderly with accelerating dementia prevalence and incidence.
What is next in this microenvironmental pollution of our national bloodstreams and vessels of terrestrial seawater capable of ambulation? Will you as legislators upon hearing of the research accumulating in the world’s literature on the acceleration of dementia via aluminum and mercury in the various routes of bodily entry, begin to defend your own right to choose to avoid metals intoxicants to your brain before congregating in the state capitol? Please recognize my home state of North Dakota and my tax dollars have come into play to help your state with an innocuous measles outbreak that can be treated with high dose vitamin A.
Additionally, the root of the behavioral economics problems of marketing vaccines in this day are directly related to smart parents understanding some of the issues of graft in government as well as overt scientific fraud. There are many MDs, PhDs, DVMs, RNs, NPs, JDs, and other professional parents who vaccinated their children as my spouse and I did on schedule only to find all these criminal conundrums after we saw our children fall off a metal-induced immunologically eroded cliff of neurodevelopmental delay.
If removing philosophical exemptions to participation in fraudulent unregulated markets are what your collective actions bring to bear in your state, you may find liabilities that you did not anticipate. I can say this without reservation, the most pervasive molecular crime against humanity in the last 20 years has been the use of aluminum injections on day one of life which have no medical indication. Diagnostic medicine has long ago marked the crime of medical assault on American babies whose mothers’ obstetric laboratory panels have shown millions of times over that they are delivering antibodies against the Hep B vaccine itself to their fetuses. There is no medical indication for a vaccine on day one of life outside of active infection of the mother. The rest of my colleagues in medicine would be sued or lose their license for serial billing of the state or insurance companies on completely worthless un-indicated interventions like Hep B on day one, or for that matter, at 2 months of life.
The State Auditor of North Dakota and I have met to expose wasteful practices like this in medicine to prevent our Great State from paying such fraudulent Medicaid claims. No medical indication, no medicaid funding—simple.
With growing whistleblower cases coming out of the woodwork in scientific fraud are you really ready to cast this lot towards your constituents’ children and families. The U.S. Department of Justice has a case against Merck in Pennsylvania for the scandalous corporate racketeering of scientists that were told to spike the data for mumps to pass the bar of 95% efficacy, ostensibly so that Merck would not lose the monopoly on MMR in this country. I believe you can all see now that the only check and balance in the system against fraud in vaccine science is a public consumer (parents) becoming aware within our nation discourse regarding these issues. Please hold the line on the philosophical exceptions for the greater good of Washington’s political well-being. Forcing your youngest citizens to participate in a fraud and racketeering scheme is a violation of basic human rights. We first need ethical corporate leadership in the vaccine industry before we can trust our genetically-disabled to the gross negligence of entire generations of humans being treated like cattle.
Thank you for your time and attention, may the wisdom of the great decision makers of history help you discern the best for your state regarding philosophical exemptions.
Sincerely,
Dr. Edward F. Fogarty, Illinois, 2/20/19
Tuesday, 19 February 2019
On Vaccine Adjuvants
There are no clinically approved (aluminium) adjuvants.
There are only clinically approved "vaccines".
In late 2018, Dr. Chris Exley, Professor in Bioinorganic Chemistry at Keele University, discussed his views on vaccine adjuvants' questionable safety:
https://vimeo.com/317531401
Here is my summary, including some excerpts from Exley's speech:
Adjuvants have not undergone any sort of safety trial beforehand. The safety of adjuvants is established alongside the safety of vaccines, in other words, no specific safety testing is done on key components of the vaccine such as the adjuvants.
So, why are aluminium adjuvants used as placebos in vaccine safety trials?
"In fact, so-called 'safety trials' for aluminium adjuvants occur with the vaccine, so the safety of the adjuvant is established alongside the vaccine. So, in other words, a vaccine that has an aluminium adjuvant goes through an - inverted commas - 'safety trial'."
Adjuvants do not undergo specific safety trials, and the conditions for an entire vaccine to be safe are loose to say the least.
Aluminium adjuvants are included in placebos in vaccine safety trials. "Placebo" means "do no harm" — this means aluminium adjuvants are assumed to do no harm in safety trials, without any evidence they have actually been properly tested to prove such an assertion.
Exley states that he wrote a letter detailing his concerns to a leading medical journal:
"I wrote a letter to one of the leading journals exactly on this a while ago, pointing out: 'why are we using something which does and is known to produce harm as a placebo in vaccine safety trials?'. The journal had no problem publishing the letter, but did it change anything in the world of vaccine safety trials? Absolutely nothing, absolutely nothing."
Adjuvants are inherently toxic, that's part of their purpose.
Adjuvants are supposed to stimulate the immune system to get it to produce antibodies, at the point of injection you get a little red mark; an inflammatory response has occurred. That's toxicity.
If this toxicity was only at the injection site, none of us would worry about vaccines - but is that what we are seeing in recipients of these vaccines? Is a contained, controlled inflammation and immune response really what is happening? Or do the problems run deeper than meets the eye?
Exley has developed a way to identify aluminium in a cell or human tissue such as the brain.
Studying how adjuvant aluminium is distributed throughout the human body, Dr. Exley has used laboratory testing to find where the aluminium salts end up in the body.
From about 13:30 in the video, Exley states that an aluminium-identifying "orange fluorescence" is the colour that comes up in his studies in affected human cells and tissue.
Exposing human cells to a common aluminum adjuvant called "Alhydrogel", showed how the aluminium was taken up inside the cells on the presentation images displayed by Exley.
"They load up on the adjuvant. They (the cells) fill their cytoplasm with it."
If you put adjuvants exclusively in the "placebo" then subtract it from the "vaccine" you have a "safe vaccine".
There are only clinically approved "vaccines".
In late 2018, Dr. Chris Exley, Professor in Bioinorganic Chemistry at Keele University, discussed his views on vaccine adjuvants' questionable safety:
https://vimeo.com/317531401
Here is my summary, including some excerpts from Exley's speech:
Adjuvants have not undergone any sort of safety trial beforehand. The safety of adjuvants is established alongside the safety of vaccines, in other words, no specific safety testing is done on key components of the vaccine such as the adjuvants.
So, why are aluminium adjuvants used as placebos in vaccine safety trials?
"In fact, so-called 'safety trials' for aluminium adjuvants occur with the vaccine, so the safety of the adjuvant is established alongside the vaccine. So, in other words, a vaccine that has an aluminium adjuvant goes through an - inverted commas - 'safety trial'."
Adjuvants do not undergo specific safety trials, and the conditions for an entire vaccine to be safe are loose to say the least.
Aluminium adjuvants are included in placebos in vaccine safety trials. "Placebo" means "do no harm" — this means aluminium adjuvants are assumed to do no harm in safety trials, without any evidence they have actually been properly tested to prove such an assertion.
Exley states that he wrote a letter detailing his concerns to a leading medical journal:
"I wrote a letter to one of the leading journals exactly on this a while ago, pointing out: 'why are we using something which does and is known to produce harm as a placebo in vaccine safety trials?'. The journal had no problem publishing the letter, but did it change anything in the world of vaccine safety trials? Absolutely nothing, absolutely nothing."
Adjuvants are inherently toxic, that's part of their purpose.
Adjuvants are supposed to stimulate the immune system to get it to produce antibodies, at the point of injection you get a little red mark; an inflammatory response has occurred. That's toxicity.
If this toxicity was only at the injection site, none of us would worry about vaccines - but is that what we are seeing in recipients of these vaccines? Is a contained, controlled inflammation and immune response really what is happening? Or do the problems run deeper than meets the eye?
Exley has developed a way to identify aluminium in a cell or human tissue such as the brain.
Studying how adjuvant aluminium is distributed throughout the human body, Dr. Exley has used laboratory testing to find where the aluminium salts end up in the body.
From about 13:30 in the video, Exley states that an aluminium-identifying "orange fluorescence" is the colour that comes up in his studies in affected human cells and tissue.
Exposing human cells to a common aluminum adjuvant called "Alhydrogel", showed how the aluminium was taken up inside the cells on the presentation images displayed by Exley.
"They load up on the adjuvant. They (the cells) fill their cytoplasm with it."
If you put adjuvants exclusively in the "placebo" then subtract it from the "vaccine" you have a "safe vaccine".
Monday, 18 February 2019
Putin: No Independent Countries Left
Europe can’t oppose the US deployment of missiles, even if it is contrary to their interests, because no country can be truly independent these days, Vladimir Putin believes.
The Russian president thinks “the modern world is the world of interdependency” and there are no truly independent countries these days.
“Do you think European countries want missiles in Europe? Nobody wants it. But they keep silent. Where is their sovereignty?” Putin asked during his recent visit in Sochi.
The EU Parliament, he said, makes more decisions on behalf of the member countries than “the Supreme Soviet of USSR on behalf of constituent republics” back in the days.
This is especially echoed in the recent Venezuela troubles, in which most of the EU caved to the US interests in regime change; only Italy vetoed the EU recognition of the Venezuelan puppet opposition leader Guaido with Russia, China, Turkey and Iran saying they see Maduro as the only legitimate leader, warning against meddling in Venezuela’s domestic affairs.
On Thursday leaders from Russia, Turkey and Iran gathered in the Black Sea city of Sochi to discuss ways of ending Syria’s crisis. The talks were held amid hostile talk emerging from a meeting of the US and its allies in Warsaw, where they talked about their take on the Middle East.
During the meeting in Sochi, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his Iranian counterpart Hassan Rouhani expressed doubts over Washington’s plan to remove troops stationed with Kurdish forces in northern Syria. But Putin seemed to be the most optimistic that the move would actually happen soon.
After the summit on Syria ended, Putin stayed on in Sochi to hold talks with Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenko concerning the supranational union of the two nations among other topics following the looming threat of the US-EU's creeping soft and hard powers - including its brooding missile emplacements that are, according to the US, "aimed at Iran".
The Russian president thinks “the modern world is the world of interdependency” and there are no truly independent countries these days.
“Do you think European countries want missiles in Europe? Nobody wants it. But they keep silent. Where is their sovereignty?” Putin asked during his recent visit in Sochi.
The EU Parliament, he said, makes more decisions on behalf of the member countries than “the Supreme Soviet of USSR on behalf of constituent republics” back in the days.
This is especially echoed in the recent Venezuela troubles, in which most of the EU caved to the US interests in regime change; only Italy vetoed the EU recognition of the Venezuelan puppet opposition leader Guaido with Russia, China, Turkey and Iran saying they see Maduro as the only legitimate leader, warning against meddling in Venezuela’s domestic affairs.
There are no fully independent states in the world.
On Thursday leaders from Russia, Turkey and Iran gathered in the Black Sea city of Sochi to discuss ways of ending Syria’s crisis. The talks were held amid hostile talk emerging from a meeting of the US and its allies in Warsaw, where they talked about their take on the Middle East.
During the meeting in Sochi, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his Iranian counterpart Hassan Rouhani expressed doubts over Washington’s plan to remove troops stationed with Kurdish forces in northern Syria. But Putin seemed to be the most optimistic that the move would actually happen soon.
After the summit on Syria ended, Putin stayed on in Sochi to hold talks with Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenko concerning the supranational union of the two nations among other topics following the looming threat of the US-EU's creeping soft and hard powers - including its brooding missile emplacements that are, according to the US, "aimed at Iran".
Thursday, 14 February 2019
Italy & Hungary: Taking Back Control
Recent populist moves by Hungary's Viktor Orbán and Italy's Matteo Salvini have widened the rift between their nations and transnational EU policies.
This new tax incentive is a clear pro-white move to boost the native Hungarian population, such a powerful incentive is proof that mass migration is not necessary to replenish a declining population.
Orbán stated that “they (the EU) want as many migrants to enter as there are missing kids, so that the numbers will add up. We Hungarians have a different way of thinking. Instead of just numbers, we want Hungarian children. Migration for us is surrender.” Orbán also called for anti-migration politicians to take over the EU, as he recently hailed a new partnership between Poland’s right wing government and Italy’s populist interior minister, Matteo Salvini.
Salvini has called for wresting control of Italy's sizeable gold reserves away from the country's central bank in a series of threats to the independence of the Bank of Italy by Rome's populist coalition.
He said the Bank of Italy and Consob, the country’s stock market regulator, should be "reduced to zero, more than changing one or two people, reduced to zero" or in other words eliminated, and that “fraudsters” who inflicted losses on Italian savers should "end up in prison for a long time."
Meanwhile, ECB head Mario Draghi, an Italian and former former governor of the Bank of Italy, last year warned that central bank independence was under threat by populist governments, while not making a direct reference to Italy. Should Salvini cement his de facto Italian leadership in upcoming elections, it would make life for the local central bank especially complicated.
Recently, the government nominated Paolo Savona, a veteran economist and prominent Eurosceptic who had previously served as minister for European affairs, as the new president of Consob. Savona was last year been blocked as the coalition’s first choice as economy minister by Italian president Sergio Mattarella, following strong pressure from Brussels and a revolt in the Italian bond market.
- Orbán has passed a law permitting families with four or more children to be exempt from income tax for life:
This new tax incentive is a clear pro-white move to boost the native Hungarian population, such a powerful incentive is proof that mass migration is not necessary to replenish a declining population.
Orbán stated that “they (the EU) want as many migrants to enter as there are missing kids, so that the numbers will add up. We Hungarians have a different way of thinking. Instead of just numbers, we want Hungarian children. Migration for us is surrender.” Orbán also called for anti-migration politicians to take over the EU, as he recently hailed a new partnership between Poland’s right wing government and Italy’s populist interior minister, Matteo Salvini.
- Salvini has called for central banking in Italy to be audited and "reduced to zero":
Salvini has called for wresting control of Italy's sizeable gold reserves away from the country's central bank in a series of threats to the independence of the Bank of Italy by Rome's populist coalition.
He said the Bank of Italy and Consob, the country’s stock market regulator, should be "reduced to zero, more than changing one or two people, reduced to zero" or in other words eliminated, and that “fraudsters” who inflicted losses on Italian savers should "end up in prison for a long time."
Meanwhile, ECB head Mario Draghi, an Italian and former former governor of the Bank of Italy, last year warned that central bank independence was under threat by populist governments, while not making a direct reference to Italy. Should Salvini cement his de facto Italian leadership in upcoming elections, it would make life for the local central bank especially complicated.
Recently, the government nominated Paolo Savona, a veteran economist and prominent Eurosceptic who had previously served as minister for European affairs, as the new president of Consob. Savona was last year been blocked as the coalition’s first choice as economy minister by Italian president Sergio Mattarella, following strong pressure from Brussels and a revolt in the Italian bond market.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)