Friday, 29 March 2019

Multiculturalism: For A Race That Will Accept Tyranny?

Rootless, spiritless underlings are desirable. A mestizo race of rootless cosmopolitan simpletons is the cultural-Marxist goal, in order to flood the West and balkanize the electorate to eradicate the voting power of those who still identify with their nation.

By introducing foreign groups with foreign propensities globalists can buy votes for their internationalist supranational brand of politics.

You also buy the apathetic, unintelligent genetics that will allow that internationalism to take hold and keep its grip; from there the globalist agenda is unclear — a nihilist consumer society, or one (eventually) guided by the principles of Luciferian Freemasonry, with all humankind under their boot?

This isn't a hypothetical conclusion - this is seen around the world in all nonwhite nations - the inhabitants and their unfavorable genetic behaviors and inclinations are being mass-imported into Europe as I write this. The EU is a sociopolitical welfare "paradise" designed to attract this mass immigration.

[caption id="attachment_16914" align="aligncenter" width="364"]1553869732390.jpg Multiculturalism eliminates the races adapted in their own environments with their own cultures and customs. It destroys the vibrancy of true diversity; people living in their own nations with their own kind under their own laws and traditions.[/caption]

Asians/Indians are an ideal race for an underclass to be ruled over.

Asians/Indians (and to a lesser extent, Africans) are the best population to rule over if you're an Elite presiding over them. They have three major desirable traits to tyrants; passivity, lack of creativity, and moderate intelligence.

They have a proven record of being less resistant to tyranny — it's no coincidence that their cultures never birthed or maintained liberty, freedoms, and constitutionalism in any meaningful form whatsoever. So how can we expect them to uphold it in Europe? The answer is they likely will not only not do so, but due to their lacking social empathy — won't care to do so.

The People's Republic of China is a prime example of where tyranny has been allowed to flourish by a race of (mostly) gormless, submissive conformists, that lack the necessary creativity, general intelligence, and empathy to question, address, and maintain a healthy state and nation. Their conformity has assisted them though, as their in-group preference has been impenetrable to outside forces. While lacking creative faculties, the Chinese are intelligent enough to create a global industrial powerhouse, albeit at the expense of its workers' standard of living.

An example of racial advantage across national boundaries, as seen with Jews in the West - is in Indonesia, the Chinese Indonesian community make up 3% of the population, but control 70% of the economy.

In the Republic of India, similarly to China, a form of modern slavery is also in effect - people work long hours for barely any money - here, it is money, not wellbeing, that is the objective. An estimated IQ of Indians (from the subcontinent of India) living in the UK is 93, about 7 points below the average Briton. In India itself this figure is lower due to environmental reasons (lower standard of education, etc). Adding environmental factors; radiation, fluoridation, a sedentary lifestyle, additives, pesticides, vaccinations, chemtrailing, and brainwashing - and this figure is potentially lowered yet further.

These nonwhites are more easily exploited by multinational companies that disregard their quality of life, directly linked to their lower IQ - they fail to effectively unionize or ensure political systems defending individual rights. The Indians, as well as the Chinese, Africans and Arabs, generally accept this servitude - no glimmer of push-back or revolution as seen in France with the yellow vest movement. Nothing at all. They are at a lower state of consciousness, more firmly tied to the baseness of human animosity than whites.

Tyranny will reign over any nonwhite population. As evidenced around the world already.

Or, what whites consider "tyranny" is acceptable and tolerable to other races who don't generally practice values of liberty or constitutionalism.

Population-1950-21001

The r-K selection theory is a theory which argues that different species face a trade-off between high rate of reproduction (r-strategy) and extensive care for their offspring (K-strategy). Humans may be the most K species of all.

J. Philippe Rushton applied r-K selection theory on human races and argued that human races differ regarding their degree K-strategy, which is argued to explain many racial differences.

He further argued that Europeans and East Asians evolved more toward a K-strategy than Africans because of a colder and more predictable climate and environment. Rushton argued that the survival challenges of making warm clothes, building durable shelter, preserving food, and strategically hunting large animals all selected genes for greater intelligence and social organization among the populations that migrated to cold climates.

Nonwhites tend to have no or few biological traits responsible for an expression of healthy individualism, as informed by a more K-selective profile — because of this, their version of sociological collectivism is inherently conducive to tyrannous rule — and allows a substantial measure of corruption to pervade their societies.

Some Asians are reasonably intelligent, but very susceptible to societal norms, they generally lack the useful "collective individualism" of the white man.

They are very passive and will tolerate a lot of nanny-statism. They're reasonably smart so you'll get enough people to man the high IQ positions in society like that of a surgeon and professor. But most of all they're happy to live in overcrowded cities in their shoebox apartments where they can content themselves with the latest gadgets and takeout.

1553876983956.jpg

They cram themselves into overstretched public transport and civil services. They work for peanuts and won't complain about paying obscenely high taxes, let alone ask where that money is going.

The bottom line: nonwhites are overwhelmingly apathetic, uncreative unquestioning consumers concerned with their immediate needs. Whites are questioning creative empaths and social gadflies; able to challenge systems, norms and institutions and have the foresight to make necessary amendments, having a more innate ability to effectively organize themselves.

[caption id="attachment_16913" align="aligncenter" width="629"]1553868154214 The typical rush hour in the Asian third world. In any self-respecting white nation there would be an uproar at such poor standards.[/caption]

A race that was forged under cold, scarce and other unfavorable environmental limitations is the only option for preserving freedoms and civilization.

The Nordic and Germanic white race are the single race forged most aptly under scarce conditions, their descendants have created nearly all in the world of note. Is it any wonder Germany is known as Das Land der Dichter und Denker (“the land of poets and thinkers”).

Their stock built the economic, social, and political systems and machinations that define the modern world. All races adapted to their environments, whether that was in body or mind or a mix of the two. But in the modern era the white man emerged as the most advantageous breed of hominid. It is undeniable that either the salvation of eugenicist policymaking is accepted, or the world slips back into the dark ages; a cluster of primitive warring states - until the graces of eugenicist evolutionary selection - or otherwise - enable a better course for human sensibility.

Their propensity for order, creativity and healthy individualism generated the most advanced society known to man; their track record is undeniable. It makes sense to be a white advocate.

The book "Human Accomplishment: The Pursuit of Excellence in the Arts and Sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950" stated that "Whether measured in people or events, 97 percent of accomplishment in the scientific inventories occurred in Europe and North America" (white people).

No whites, no civilization.

The IQ researcher Helmuth Nyborg wrote in 2012 that "The bleak situation is characteristic of the rest of Europe too, perhaps with Eastern Europe as an exception. [...] Ethnic Europeans will soon be wiped out of their own countries by this ever-expanding colossal demographic transition. Their national average IQs go down in the process, and when an average national IQ of 90 is reached, down go also their democracies and welfare. This also happens to European-Americans in the US. [...] To sum up, not only Denmark but Europe and the US get dumber by internal dysgenic decay and by northbound mass-immigration. This will have catastrophic consequences for Western democracy and welfare, but non-Western countries will also suffer. Unfortunately, most ruling (left- or right-oriented) Western leaders are not only seriously misguided by the illusion of equality but also blatantly ignorant of biological realities, so they can’t see the elephant in the room. They eventually will, but that will be beyond the point of no return."

Marxist-globalist Utopians think race-mixing will create human equality. It won't work as they envision it. 

Journalist Peter Hitchens once said that “The problem of utopia is that it can only be approached across a sea of blood, and you never arrive.”

Either Marxist-globalists want a slave class or they genuinely want to "guide human reproduction wisely", as stated on the Georgia Guidestones. The latter I'd prefer to the former. The outcome of their international experiment is yet to be fully seen, the prognosis is worrisome though.

No comments:

Post a Comment