From Carolyn Yeager's blog.
THE JEWISH WORLD IS CELEBRATING! The 89-year-old woman they have dubbed the “Nazi Grandma” has finally been incarcerated in a prison in western Germany for a two year term. According to Jewish news outlets, Ursula Haverbeck was picked up at her home in Vlotho, North-Rhine Westphalia by police on Monday and taken to the prison at nearby Bielefeld to begin serving her sentence.
https://youtu.be/CCHwIbo_JEM
(The video, by Ursula Haverbeck, that is censored in some countries. Use a VPN to bypass this.)
In this most important video, Frau Haverbeck explains how:
1) German courts decided that the movie "Holocaust" is the truth and the well known German judge who wrote a book about Auschwitz is a liar, and so are the others who researched and wrote books at the same time.
2) She tells how the German people have been deceived with the 2 Plus 4 contract telling them they are sovereign, but then the Allies and the German traitors (Jews) secretly made a contract to reverse that back to 1952. Very, very devilish.
3) It also shows the books (Die Aushwitz-Lüge/Auschwitz: A Personal Account by Thies Christophersen, Der Auschwitz-Mythos/Auschwitz: A Judge Looks at the Evidence by Wilhelm Stäglich, Der Sündenbock/Scapegoats by J. G. Burg, and Der Jahrhundertbetrug/The Hoax of the Twentieth Century by Arthur Butz) that are the foundation of revisionism; all had/have been forbidden and only the movie "Holocaust" counted. Severe corruption of the courts by the Jews in Germany.
I have been informed that her lawyer is already petitioning to have Ursula released on grounds of health.
The laws under which the Federal Republic of Germany (which is a non-Constitutional construct) prosecutes and punishes people like Haverbeck were put in place by the Americans in the late 1940's as a temporary legal structure until the people were “re-educated” enough to form a new Constitution. Called the 'Basic Law', it installed the findings of the 'International Tribunal of Major War Criminals' and subsequent post-war tribunals carried out by the WWII victor nations as law that supercedes any of the freedoms guaranteed to Germans. Under this 'legal' system, non-Germans are given great liberties and protections while the indigenous German people are forced to comply with the multiculturalization and multiracialization, and also subservience to Israel, of their homeland. If they publicly express their disagreement, they are arrested, tried, fined and jailed.
Note that the name of this people in their own language is 'Deutsch' and their country is Deutschland. Land of the Deutsch … land where Germans live. The post-war global order wants to destroy nationalism by destroying the nation itself—as said above, by multiculturalizing and multiracializing every European homeland. This is the idea behind 'One Europe.' So Deutsch people are to disappear as a unique product of evolution so that their superior qualities don't make other, less well-endowed people look bad. And so they won't be able to sucessfully interfere with the Jewish 'One Europe' plan.
The liberal political parties (that sometimes call themselves 'conservative' or 'centre' but remain liberal-globalist) that have been in power since 1945 do not want to return to a national orientation or perspective. They actually want to retain whatever American control mechanisms are in place because that helps them retain their power. This is the reason no new Constitution has ever been called for. The Basic Law is called the Constitution now, and no one questions it except the small number of patriots like Ursula Haverback who refuse to quietly let the Deutsch people disappear. Watch her talk about the phony German Constitution here.
Witches in the Middle Ages
This treatment of 'holocaust deniers' in Deutschland is similar to hunting witches in the Middle Ages. At that time, the very powerful Catholic Church terrorized women in order to keep the faithful in fear of the Church's power to condemn their souls to Hell. Sacrificing a few innocent victims in this cause did not bother the hierarchy for they told themselves the end justified the means—they were saving souls.
It is no different now. The importance of keeping the Jewish-inspired global order in place (the horrific world wars also gave them the opportunity to establish this order in the first place) is the “end” that justifies the sacrifice of the 'free speech' and democratic processes they claim to offer. In other words, Big Lies have to be backed up with many more lies, thus those who still insist on telling the truth must be sacrificed.
The greater good that they are protecting is the Global New World Order that they say is necessary to bring peace to the world.
Canadian citizen, violinist Monika Schaefer was arrested for no crime committed in Germany and has been held in a Munich prison for many weeks now because of a video she released onto the Internet from her home country of Canada where it is not against the law. Because she was visiting her brother in Germany, and attended a court hearing for Sylvia Stolz (another woman who spent a long stretch in prison for 'holocaust denial'), the German government applied it's strict laws to Monika.
The Jews are trying to get more countries to pass ever more stringent laws against 'holocaust denial' with their global campaign against 'anti-Semitism.' They flood the media with this campaign, while not covering people like Ursula Haverbeck and Monika Schaefer at all. This is a kind of tyranny and dictatorship that must be fought, but requires a level of intelligence that is being bred out of our Western and European people at a rapid rate. We are at a critical stage.
Showing posts with label Globalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Globalism. Show all posts
Saturday, 23 March 2019
Thursday, 28 February 2019
UPS Stops Delivering Packages to Swedish No-go Zones After Multiple Attacks on Drivers
Courier company UPS stopped delivering packages in the multicultural district of Rosengård in Malmö.
United Parcel Service Inc. started as a courier company in the United States in 1907 and has grown into a multi-billion dollar company. Every day, UPS handles goods, money and information in more than 200 countries and regions worldwide.
One area that currently does not receive packages is the multicultural district of Rosengård in Malmö.
UPS confirms that they no longer deliver to the area because the risk of being subjected to robbery and other crimes is too high. “Our drivers have been attacked and we have therefore decided not to distribute packages in Rosengård”, says a customer service employee.
The decision was made two months ago. Similar stops have been introduced in areas in Stockholm. And according to UPS, the new terms will remain in place as long as drivers are at risk of being attacked.
However, according to the Swedish police and left-wing politicians there are no “no-go zones” in Sweden. Only 61 “vulnerable areas”, which need prioritising and more attention from the police. 23 of these areas are identified as “particularly vulnerable.” Another handful are deemed to be in the “risk zone”.
Several of them are basically run by criminals and the police cannot carry out their job. Car fires, grenade attacks and bombings occur almost daily. Police, firefighters and ambulance workers are attacked by migrants and prevented from doing their job on a regular basis.
The situation has gotten so bad that ambulance unions have put forth requests for bullet proof vests to be given to paramedics operating in the problematic areas.
The bombing of a police station in Helsingborg recently was described by Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Löfven as an “attack” on democracy itself.
In the migrant-majority town of Södertälje, a police station was shot at ten times overnight, though no officers were present at the station at the time.
Many such attacks have been captured on surveillance and other cameras and are widely available to be seen online. Footage from 2015 shows police officers being attacked while others are shouting “you are not in charge here” to them.
Four stations in Stockholm Metro have become so dangerous for personnel that they are only able to perform their duties with the help of extra police.
Parking attendants are being chased away or attacked. Thus parking companies cannot guarantee for their employees safety.
The government-owned postal service PostNord has halted mail delivery to some addresses near the troubled Stockholm suburb of Rinkeby.
And now UPS stops delivering packages to certain areas.
The definition of “no-go zone” is “a region where the ruling authorities have lost control and are unable to enforce the rule of law”. Which means that there without a doubt are no-go zones in Sweden – and that Swedish politicians and police are flat-out lying.
United Parcel Service Inc. started as a courier company in the United States in 1907 and has grown into a multi-billion dollar company. Every day, UPS handles goods, money and information in more than 200 countries and regions worldwide.
One area that currently does not receive packages is the multicultural district of Rosengård in Malmö.
UPS confirms that they no longer deliver to the area because the risk of being subjected to robbery and other crimes is too high. “Our drivers have been attacked and we have therefore decided not to distribute packages in Rosengård”, says a customer service employee.
The decision was made two months ago. Similar stops have been introduced in areas in Stockholm. And according to UPS, the new terms will remain in place as long as drivers are at risk of being attacked.
However, according to the Swedish police and left-wing politicians there are no “no-go zones” in Sweden. Only 61 “vulnerable areas”, which need prioritising and more attention from the police. 23 of these areas are identified as “particularly vulnerable.” Another handful are deemed to be in the “risk zone”.
Several of them are basically run by criminals and the police cannot carry out their job. Car fires, grenade attacks and bombings occur almost daily. Police, firefighters and ambulance workers are attacked by migrants and prevented from doing their job on a regular basis.
The situation has gotten so bad that ambulance unions have put forth requests for bullet proof vests to be given to paramedics operating in the problematic areas.
The bombing of a police station in Helsingborg recently was described by Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Löfven as an “attack” on democracy itself.
In the migrant-majority town of Södertälje, a police station was shot at ten times overnight, though no officers were present at the station at the time.
Many such attacks have been captured on surveillance and other cameras and are widely available to be seen online. Footage from 2015 shows police officers being attacked while others are shouting “you are not in charge here” to them.
Four stations in Stockholm Metro have become so dangerous for personnel that they are only able to perform their duties with the help of extra police.
Parking attendants are being chased away or attacked. Thus parking companies cannot guarantee for their employees safety.
The government-owned postal service PostNord has halted mail delivery to some addresses near the troubled Stockholm suburb of Rinkeby.
And now UPS stops delivering packages to certain areas.
The definition of “no-go zone” is “a region where the ruling authorities have lost control and are unable to enforce the rule of law”. Which means that there without a doubt are no-go zones in Sweden – and that Swedish politicians and police are flat-out lying.
Tuesday, 4 December 2018
Terraforming has begun: “Global dimming” is a plot to exterminate humanity by terraforming the atmosphere with smog pollution, killing Earth’s food crops and unleashing ecological collapse
Article from Mike Adams at Natural News.
Now we come to the end game for humanity. This is it, folks: They have a plan to collapse global food production, kill off over 90% of the human race, devastate natural ecosystems and pollute the Earth’s atmosphere… and it’s all being sold to you under the banner of “environmentalism.”
The scheme is called “global dimming,” and it’s a dangerous geoengineering plot to spray billions of tons of smog into the atmosphere so that pollution levels would block sunlight and halt global warming. This is literally what the mad environmental scientists are now proposing — the very same people who have, for years, claimed that “chemtrails” are a conspiracy theory and don’t exist. Now, all of a sudden, they want to chemtrail the entire planet in order to “save” us all from global warming.
The global dimming scheme is, of course, based on spraying chemtrails into the upper atmosphere using thousands of high-altitude flights that release pollution to dim the sun. The very idea of “chemtrails” has, until now, been mocked by the media and the science establishment, who have for years claimed the very idea of chemtrails is a lunatic conspiracy theory. So they’ve changed the name to “stratospheric aerosol injection,” and they now have a science paper that outlines all the costs involved.
“We lay out a future solar geoengineering deployment scenario of halving the increase in anthropogenic radiative forcing,” writes Wake Smith and Gernot Wagner in their paper, “Stratospheric aerosol injection tactics and costs in the first 15 years of deployment.” Published in Environmental Research Letters, you can view the full text of the study at this link.
Geoengineering is another term that many people use synonymously with “chemtrails.” And now it’s a strategy being openly advocated by scientists to halt so-called “climate change,” a fake science hoax that has been perpetrated on the world by power-hungry globalists who want humanity to surrender to global rule in the name of “saving the planet.”
The study cites the specific aircraft that would be needed to achieve chemtrails pollution. “[P]urpose-built high-altitude tanker with substantial payload capabilities” would be deployed to spray sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere. The paper proposes 4000 flights a year, costing $2.25 billion per year, continuing over 15 years to make sure the atmosphere is significantly polluted to dim the sun and achieve the terraforming goals of globalists (see more details, below).
In the conclusion of their abstract, the study authors explain the program would require, “thousands of flights annually by airliner-sized aircraft operating from an international array of bases,” making it almost impossible to keep secret.
Of course, this very program has already begun, and secrecy isn’t necessary when you have the entire media and science establishment condemning any belief in chemtrails as a form of mental illness. So just remember: As they pollute the skies and dim the sun, if you point out that they’re polluting the skies and dimming the sun, you’re a “conspiracy theorist.”
And there’s no such thing as chemtrails, you see. Nope, it’s “stratospheric aerosol injection” now, which sounds almost sciency. That’s how this program is already being perpetrated right under our noses, right now, even while the media runs a global cover-up to dismiss such ideas as bizarre theories.
The global controllers hope you never read the science papers, of course, because there, geoengineering is routinely cited and even advocated as the “solution” to climate change.
“Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) would require lofting hundreds of thousands to millions of tons of material each year to altitudes up to ~20 km,” explain study authors. They also ask, “Could it be done in secret?”
The study offers heavy discussion on the design and costs of aircraft that could deliver the planned pollution to the upper atmosphere:
IPCC (2018) states that ‘there is high agreement that aircrafts after some modifications could inject millions of tons of SO2 in the lower stratosphere (~20 km)’.
The overall goal of the geoengineering program is to inject 5 million tons of SO2 (sulfur dioxide, otherwise known as “smog”) into the atmosphere. Achieving that goal, “assumes a rational actor seeking to implement a scientifically sensible SAI program,” write the study authors, somehow claiming it is “rational” to disperse mass pollution across the atmosphere of your own planet. The same authors also claim this program must be conducted, “purely out of humanitarian and environmental considerations.”
In considering the sheer lunacy of the “Stratospheric Aerosol Injection” plan, I feel compelled to state that these climate change / global warming scientists are dangerously insane sociopaths and they must be stopped before they murder us all. These lunatics, if given enough government funding, will literally murder our planet and destroy human civilization. Such is the cost of the decades of false propaganda in our public schools that has brainwashed children into believing “climate change” is real and must be halted. The schemes now being proposed to halt this non-existent problem will, themselves, bring about the global destruction that children are being warned about with global warming.
This global pollution / terraforming program, if allowed to continue, could unleash the following devastating consequences, especially if deployed at a time when the sun is in its own dimming cycle that would accelerate global cooling.
#1) Global collapse of food crops – The reduction in solar radiation caused by geoengineering, combined with the natural cycle of global cooling from sun cycles, could produce a sharp reduction in food crop production across the globe. This would result in increased food prices and reduced food supplies, adding to vectors for civil unrest and “climate refugees” invading First World nations to escape starvation.
#2) Global rise in cancer from vitamin D deficiency – Reduction in solar radiation reaching the surface of the planet would exacerbate vitamin D deficiencies that already strongly contribute to cancer fatalities around the world. Sunlight is currently the primary source of vitamin D for billions of world citizens. Dimming the sun would be a death sentence for millions each year who would suffer the dire consequences of chronic vitamin D deficiencies.
#3) Global drop in IQs due to increased air pollution – Increases in air pollution have been scientifically found to lower children’s IQs. In addition, air pollution is scientifically documented to damage DNA in the womb, increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmia and increase the risk of bone loss in humans.
#4) Massive loss of habitat and ecosystems due to decreased sunlight and colder temperatures – Entire ecosystems — such as rainforests — could be devastated by a pollution-initiated drop in solar radiation. Marine ecosystems also rely heavily on solar radiation to power the photosynthesis of ocean plants such as seaweeds, grasses and algae, which serve as a pillar food source for the entire marine food web. Dimming the sun would have devastating consequences for all ecosystems on the planet, resulting in a catastrophic loss of life, habitat and eco-diversity.
#5) Huge increase in global acid rain that will devastate forests and food crops – The mass injection of SO2 into the atmosphere will result in SO2 being dispersed into lower levels of the atmosphere over time. There, mixed with rain storms, it will create sulfurous acid, otherwise known as acid rain. This acid rain will devastate forests and food crops and result in the acidification of crop soils, destabilizing soil microbes and leading the widespread crop losses.
#6) Decreased plant production of oxygen that’s necessary for humans, primates and mammals to survive – Nearly all plants depend on solar radiation for photosynthesis, which uses CO2 as a “fuel” and produces oxygen (O2) as a byproduct. Reducing solar radiation through chemtrails pollution would reduce the production of oxygen by plants, resulting in a global fall in atmospheric oxygen levels, ultimately leading to the mass asphyxiation of humans, primates and mammals if allowed to continue. Even the EPA (see source below) admits that SO2 interferes with human respiration and makes it difficult for people to breathe.
Note carefully that the geoengineering efforts being advocated to dim the sun are based on sulfur dioxide, a known pollutant. “Short-term exposures to SO2 can harm the human respiratory system and make breathing difficult,” warns the EPA. “…[G]aseous SOx can harm trees and plants by damaging foliage and decreasing growth… SO2 and other sulfur oxides can contribute to acid rain which can harm sensitive ecosystems,” the EPA writes.
In other words, it isn’t even debated whether sulfur dioxide is a pollutant. It’s smog (or technically, it reacts to create smog), and the very idea that mass polluting the atmosphere with SO2 would somehow “save” the planet is rooted in nothing less than advanced psychosis or some other dangerous form of mental illness. That such schemes are marketed under the banner of “science” just shows how twisted the institution of science has now become.
Why would any rational institution seek to mass pollute our entire planet and destroy food crops, forests, mammals, primates and humans? The answer is even more shocking than the proposal itself, it turns out. Keep reading, as one possible explanation for all this continues below…
It was only a generation ago that young scientists were being warned that Earth was entering a “global cooling” crisis that would bring about a whole new ice age. This was the climate panic of the 1970s and early 1980s. Today’s older scientists remember the warnings quite well. We were all told that if we didn’t find a way to warm the planet, we would all perish as Earth was turned into a ball of ice.
Beginning in the 1990s, the scientists flipped the script, reversing their warning and suddenly claiming the problem was too much heat. We were all going to die from global warming if we didn’t change something, we were told. A decade or so later, when it was revealed that government science scammers were faking all the warming data, they changed the scam to “climate change,” since they couldn’t scientifically support either warming or cooling.
Here’s the cover of TIME Magazine from 1977, which warns, “How To Survive The Coming Ice Age,” then urges readers to get on board to save the planet, saying, “51 Things You Can Do to Make a Difference.”
Today, we’re told the most absurd, insane things by these scientists who insist that the climate never changed at all before the year 1920, with the rise of the combustion engine and “human activity.” And now we’re constantly terrorized by the fake news media into thinking that if we don’t pollute the Earth’s atmosphere with smog, we will all somehow die from the rise of carbon dioxide, the No. 1 most important greening nutrient for plants, forests and food crops.
So now they’ve decided they have to poison the atmosphere to fight climate change, and they’ve got about a billion gullible world citizens convinced that this is somehow an amazing idea. What they would really unleash, of course, is absolutely catastrophic to all life on our world. Remember: They want to disperse billions of tons of sulfur dioxide (smog) into the atmosphere through massive government-funded chemtrailing of the planet. The question now emerges: Is the destruction of humanity deliberate? If so, who would hatch such a nefarious plan?
Here’s the cosmic inconvenient truth that Al Gore doesn’t want you to consider. What we are really witnessing here is the planned terraforming of planet Earth for some other purpose. And by “other,” I mean other than human.
If you wanted humans to thrive on planet Earth, you would not unleash mass pollution, acid rain, food crop failures, oxygen depletion and global dimming. You would, instead, try to reduce pollution, support plant life, enhance food crop production and protect global ecosystems from pollution. That’s the normal, rational thing that any human being would naturally want to pursue.
Yet we are subjected to these nefarious geoengineering schemes that directly contradict every principle of sustainable life on Earth. And it’s all described as a way to “save” the planet, even as it would destroy global life support for humans.
I can’t help but be reminded of the outstanding film Oblivion, starring Tom Cruise. In the film, the Cruise character thinks he’s protecting human civilization, but he’s actually (unknowingly) working for extraterrestrials who are stealing Earth’s resources and exterminating humans. The film is one of the best science fiction films of all time, and its story sounds eerily similar to what may be happening right now with so-called “geoengineering.”
Who (or what) would want to alter the atmosphere, decimate oxygen levels, destroy the food supply and collapse human civilization? The answer should be obvious: Something that is in competition with humans and sees no further use for humanity. Human life on Earth appears to be in the process of being “cleansed” in a cosmic ethnic cleansing scheme that will produce an altered, low-oxygen atmosphere that might prove advantageous to a life form which isn’t already part of Earth’s existing ecosystem. The reduction in solar radiation reaching Earth’s surface would make the planet more hospital to a life form that originated from a planet located farther from its home sun than Earth is from our own sun.
It raises the obvious, if bizarre-sounding, question: Are Earth’s globalists preparing the planet for a post-human era? And is that plan disguised as a “climate change” emergency course of action so that the gullible people can be told the mass pollution of the skies is a bold plan to save humanity rather than exterminate it? What if “climate change” is actually a cosmic false flag hoax that was designed from the very start to convince Earthlings to support their own extermination? Given the now-planned destruction of Earth’s atmosphere in the name of “climate change,” we must now consider such possibilities, no matter how bizarre they first seem.
Why are all the globalists suddenly talking about escaping to Mars and terraforming Marsinto a habitat where humans can survive? Why are globalists now so desperate the alter Earth’s atmosphere and make the planet inhospitable to humans? Why such a recent focus on the Arctic seed vault to preserve the seeds of life in preparation for a global cataclysm? Why are so many globalist insiders building underground bunkers and living in them?
I don’t have the answers to all these questions, but I do know that the fairy tale stories we’re being told about “climate change” and how we must save the planet by polluting the skies are rooted in complete quack science fiction and brainwashing propaganda.
On the other hand, if humans are stupid enough to destroy their own planet in the name of saving the planet, perhaps they’re simply not qualified to participate in an intelligence universe after all. Natural selection, after all, is likely playing out on a cosmic scale, and Earth appears to be flunking the cosmic IQ test that wonders, “Hey, is that civilization stupid enough to commit suicide based on a fairy tale hoax?”
So far, it appears the answer for Earth and humans is a resounding “Yes!”
Now we come to the end game for humanity. This is it, folks: They have a plan to collapse global food production, kill off over 90% of the human race, devastate natural ecosystems and pollute the Earth’s atmosphere… and it’s all being sold to you under the banner of “environmentalism.”
The scheme is called “global dimming,” and it’s a dangerous geoengineering plot to spray billions of tons of smog into the atmosphere so that pollution levels would block sunlight and halt global warming. This is literally what the mad environmental scientists are now proposing — the very same people who have, for years, claimed that “chemtrails” are a conspiracy theory and don’t exist. Now, all of a sudden, they want to chemtrail the entire planet in order to “save” us all from global warming.
“Stratospheric aerosol injection” now the new name for chemtrails / geoengineering
The global dimming scheme is, of course, based on spraying chemtrails into the upper atmosphere using thousands of high-altitude flights that release pollution to dim the sun. The very idea of “chemtrails” has, until now, been mocked by the media and the science establishment, who have for years claimed the very idea of chemtrails is a lunatic conspiracy theory. So they’ve changed the name to “stratospheric aerosol injection,” and they now have a science paper that outlines all the costs involved.
“We lay out a future solar geoengineering deployment scenario of halving the increase in anthropogenic radiative forcing,” writes Wake Smith and Gernot Wagner in their paper, “Stratospheric aerosol injection tactics and costs in the first 15 years of deployment.” Published in Environmental Research Letters, you can view the full text of the study at this link.
Geoengineering is another term that many people use synonymously with “chemtrails.” And now it’s a strategy being openly advocated by scientists to halt so-called “climate change,” a fake science hoax that has been perpetrated on the world by power-hungry globalists who want humanity to surrender to global rule in the name of “saving the planet.”
The study cites the specific aircraft that would be needed to achieve chemtrails pollution. “[P]urpose-built high-altitude tanker with substantial payload capabilities” would be deployed to spray sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere. The paper proposes 4000 flights a year, costing $2.25 billion per year, continuing over 15 years to make sure the atmosphere is significantly polluted to dim the sun and achieve the terraforming goals of globalists (see more details, below).
In the conclusion of their abstract, the study authors explain the program would require, “thousands of flights annually by airliner-sized aircraft operating from an international array of bases,” making it almost impossible to keep secret.
Of course, this very program has already begun, and secrecy isn’t necessary when you have the entire media and science establishment condemning any belief in chemtrails as a form of mental illness. So just remember: As they pollute the skies and dim the sun, if you point out that they’re polluting the skies and dimming the sun, you’re a “conspiracy theorist.”
And there’s no such thing as chemtrails, you see. Nope, it’s “stratospheric aerosol injection” now, which sounds almost sciency. That’s how this program is already being perpetrated right under our noses, right now, even while the media runs a global cover-up to dismiss such ideas as bizarre theories.
The global controllers hope you never read the science papers, of course, because there, geoengineering is routinely cited and even advocated as the “solution” to climate change.
Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) explained… and yeah, it’s just another name for chemtrails
“Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) would require lofting hundreds of thousands to millions of tons of material each year to altitudes up to ~20 km,” explain study authors. They also ask, “Could it be done in secret?”
The study offers heavy discussion on the design and costs of aircraft that could deliver the planned pollution to the upper atmosphere:
IPCC (2018) states that ‘there is high agreement that aircrafts after some modifications could inject millions of tons of SO2 in the lower stratosphere (~20 km)’.
The overall goal of the geoengineering program is to inject 5 million tons of SO2 (sulfur dioxide, otherwise known as “smog”) into the atmosphere. Achieving that goal, “assumes a rational actor seeking to implement a scientifically sensible SAI program,” write the study authors, somehow claiming it is “rational” to disperse mass pollution across the atmosphere of your own planet. The same authors also claim this program must be conducted, “purely out of humanitarian and environmental considerations.”
Shocking realization: This is terraforming planet Earth to collapse the global food supply and kill off humans
In considering the sheer lunacy of the “Stratospheric Aerosol Injection” plan, I feel compelled to state that these climate change / global warming scientists are dangerously insane sociopaths and they must be stopped before they murder us all. These lunatics, if given enough government funding, will literally murder our planet and destroy human civilization. Such is the cost of the decades of false propaganda in our public schools that has brainwashed children into believing “climate change” is real and must be halted. The schemes now being proposed to halt this non-existent problem will, themselves, bring about the global destruction that children are being warned about with global warming.
This global pollution / terraforming program, if allowed to continue, could unleash the following devastating consequences, especially if deployed at a time when the sun is in its own dimming cycle that would accelerate global cooling.
#1) Global collapse of food crops – The reduction in solar radiation caused by geoengineering, combined with the natural cycle of global cooling from sun cycles, could produce a sharp reduction in food crop production across the globe. This would result in increased food prices and reduced food supplies, adding to vectors for civil unrest and “climate refugees” invading First World nations to escape starvation.
#2) Global rise in cancer from vitamin D deficiency – Reduction in solar radiation reaching the surface of the planet would exacerbate vitamin D deficiencies that already strongly contribute to cancer fatalities around the world. Sunlight is currently the primary source of vitamin D for billions of world citizens. Dimming the sun would be a death sentence for millions each year who would suffer the dire consequences of chronic vitamin D deficiencies.
#3) Global drop in IQs due to increased air pollution – Increases in air pollution have been scientifically found to lower children’s IQs. In addition, air pollution is scientifically documented to damage DNA in the womb, increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmia and increase the risk of bone loss in humans.
#4) Massive loss of habitat and ecosystems due to decreased sunlight and colder temperatures – Entire ecosystems — such as rainforests — could be devastated by a pollution-initiated drop in solar radiation. Marine ecosystems also rely heavily on solar radiation to power the photosynthesis of ocean plants such as seaweeds, grasses and algae, which serve as a pillar food source for the entire marine food web. Dimming the sun would have devastating consequences for all ecosystems on the planet, resulting in a catastrophic loss of life, habitat and eco-diversity.
#5) Huge increase in global acid rain that will devastate forests and food crops – The mass injection of SO2 into the atmosphere will result in SO2 being dispersed into lower levels of the atmosphere over time. There, mixed with rain storms, it will create sulfurous acid, otherwise known as acid rain. This acid rain will devastate forests and food crops and result in the acidification of crop soils, destabilizing soil microbes and leading the widespread crop losses.
#6) Decreased plant production of oxygen that’s necessary for humans, primates and mammals to survive – Nearly all plants depend on solar radiation for photosynthesis, which uses CO2 as a “fuel” and produces oxygen (O2) as a byproduct. Reducing solar radiation through chemtrails pollution would reduce the production of oxygen by plants, resulting in a global fall in atmospheric oxygen levels, ultimately leading to the mass asphyxiation of humans, primates and mammals if allowed to continue. Even the EPA (see source below) admits that SO2 interferes with human respiration and makes it difficult for people to breathe.
Even the EPA recognizes sulfur dioxide as a dangerous pollutant that makes it difficult for humans to breathe
Note carefully that the geoengineering efforts being advocated to dim the sun are based on sulfur dioxide, a known pollutant. “Short-term exposures to SO2 can harm the human respiratory system and make breathing difficult,” warns the EPA. “…[G]aseous SOx can harm trees and plants by damaging foliage and decreasing growth… SO2 and other sulfur oxides can contribute to acid rain which can harm sensitive ecosystems,” the EPA writes.
In other words, it isn’t even debated whether sulfur dioxide is a pollutant. It’s smog (or technically, it reacts to create smog), and the very idea that mass polluting the atmosphere with SO2 would somehow “save” the planet is rooted in nothing less than advanced psychosis or some other dangerous form of mental illness. That such schemes are marketed under the banner of “science” just shows how twisted the institution of science has now become.
Why would any rational institution seek to mass pollute our entire planet and destroy food crops, forests, mammals, primates and humans? The answer is even more shocking than the proposal itself, it turns out. Keep reading, as one possible explanation for all this continues below…
It wasn’t long ago that scientists warned about “global cooling” and the coming Ice Age
It was only a generation ago that young scientists were being warned that Earth was entering a “global cooling” crisis that would bring about a whole new ice age. This was the climate panic of the 1970s and early 1980s. Today’s older scientists remember the warnings quite well. We were all told that if we didn’t find a way to warm the planet, we would all perish as Earth was turned into a ball of ice.
Beginning in the 1990s, the scientists flipped the script, reversing their warning and suddenly claiming the problem was too much heat. We were all going to die from global warming if we didn’t change something, we were told. A decade or so later, when it was revealed that government science scammers were faking all the warming data, they changed the scam to “climate change,” since they couldn’t scientifically support either warming or cooling.
Here’s the cover of TIME Magazine from 1977, which warns, “How To Survive The Coming Ice Age,” then urges readers to get on board to save the planet, saying, “51 Things You Can Do to Make a Difference.”
Today, we’re told the most absurd, insane things by these scientists who insist that the climate never changed at all before the year 1920, with the rise of the combustion engine and “human activity.” And now we’re constantly terrorized by the fake news media into thinking that if we don’t pollute the Earth’s atmosphere with smog, we will all somehow die from the rise of carbon dioxide, the No. 1 most important greening nutrient for plants, forests and food crops.
So now they’ve decided they have to poison the atmosphere to fight climate change, and they’ve got about a billion gullible world citizens convinced that this is somehow an amazing idea. What they would really unleash, of course, is absolutely catastrophic to all life on our world. Remember: They want to disperse billions of tons of sulfur dioxide (smog) into the atmosphere through massive government-funded chemtrailing of the planet. The question now emerges: Is the destruction of humanity deliberate? If so, who would hatch such a nefarious plan?
Geoengineering is a planet-wide weapon system being deployed to eliminate human life on Earth while terraforming the planet for some other purpose
Here’s the cosmic inconvenient truth that Al Gore doesn’t want you to consider. What we are really witnessing here is the planned terraforming of planet Earth for some other purpose. And by “other,” I mean other than human.
If you wanted humans to thrive on planet Earth, you would not unleash mass pollution, acid rain, food crop failures, oxygen depletion and global dimming. You would, instead, try to reduce pollution, support plant life, enhance food crop production and protect global ecosystems from pollution. That’s the normal, rational thing that any human being would naturally want to pursue.
Yet we are subjected to these nefarious geoengineering schemes that directly contradict every principle of sustainable life on Earth. And it’s all described as a way to “save” the planet, even as it would destroy global life support for humans.
I can’t help but be reminded of the outstanding film Oblivion, starring Tom Cruise. In the film, the Cruise character thinks he’s protecting human civilization, but he’s actually (unknowingly) working for extraterrestrials who are stealing Earth’s resources and exterminating humans. The film is one of the best science fiction films of all time, and its story sounds eerily similar to what may be happening right now with so-called “geoengineering.”
Who (or what) would want to alter the atmosphere, decimate oxygen levels, destroy the food supply and collapse human civilization? The answer should be obvious: Something that is in competition with humans and sees no further use for humanity. Human life on Earth appears to be in the process of being “cleansed” in a cosmic ethnic cleansing scheme that will produce an altered, low-oxygen atmosphere that might prove advantageous to a life form which isn’t already part of Earth’s existing ecosystem. The reduction in solar radiation reaching Earth’s surface would make the planet more hospital to a life form that originated from a planet located farther from its home sun than Earth is from our own sun.
It raises the obvious, if bizarre-sounding, question: Are Earth’s globalists preparing the planet for a post-human era? And is that plan disguised as a “climate change” emergency course of action so that the gullible people can be told the mass pollution of the skies is a bold plan to save humanity rather than exterminate it? What if “climate change” is actually a cosmic false flag hoax that was designed from the very start to convince Earthlings to support their own extermination? Given the now-planned destruction of Earth’s atmosphere in the name of “climate change,” we must now consider such possibilities, no matter how bizarre they first seem.
Why are all the globalists suddenly talking about escaping to Mars and terraforming Marsinto a habitat where humans can survive? Why are globalists now so desperate the alter Earth’s atmosphere and make the planet inhospitable to humans? Why such a recent focus on the Arctic seed vault to preserve the seeds of life in preparation for a global cataclysm? Why are so many globalist insiders building underground bunkers and living in them?
I don’t have the answers to all these questions, but I do know that the fairy tale stories we’re being told about “climate change” and how we must save the planet by polluting the skies are rooted in complete quack science fiction and brainwashing propaganda.
On the other hand, if humans are stupid enough to destroy their own planet in the name of saving the planet, perhaps they’re simply not qualified to participate in an intelligence universe after all. Natural selection, after all, is likely playing out on a cosmic scale, and Earth appears to be flunking the cosmic IQ test that wonders, “Hey, is that civilization stupid enough to commit suicide based on a fairy tale hoax?”
So far, it appears the answer for Earth and humans is a resounding “Yes!”
Saturday, 18 August 2018
The Coming 80 IQ "Precariat" Slave Underclass
The admixture of poor genetics and the subsidization and subsequent rise of poor genetics with the genetic quality of the de facto ruling class remaining the same will mean the rise of a precariat, ~80 IQ underclass ruled over by a ruling class about 30-40 IQ points (Ashkenazi Jewish IQ) above the average 80 IQ person — if the threat of eminent genetic & amplified social stratification doesn't sound problematic, I don't know what does — especially when it is well documented in scientific literature that genetics largely define us characteristically; and, on the macroscopic level, the characteristics of distinct nations of peoples — nearly every reliably measured psychological trait, especially IQ, is significantly influenced by genetic factors.
To look at at on an individual basis is too short-sighted, it's like saying "let's allow the third world to flood into Europe and assess them all as individuals" — ah, by which time the vast bulk of the deviant swathes have established themselves as parasites and run rampant. It's impractical to be too liberal on matters like this; a meritocratic, and most importantly pragmatic immigration policy is needed, a migrant comes to work, they have a purpose here, they are assessed on their qualifications and due placement in wider society — to accept a large group from a region known for its poor genetics and third world tendencies and to hope to assess them all as "individuals" is a pipe dream.
There must be compromise, sometimes absolute acts are necessary to solve partial issues.
Today's open-door migrant policy-makers know very well that most of the third world migrants won't be employed, will disproportionately commit the most crime, will disproportionately be welfare claimants; the statistics prove it (e.g. all available studies find that non-European immigrants to Britain cost about $10 billion/year).
Thus the authorities duck away when asked to list the background of migrant criminals, the media preaches how it is "irrelevant" to question the demographics behind society's major negative trends.
Mass migration is not about economics, or even assisting an ageing Europe (pro-natal policies can easily amend that) this is about replacement, nothing less — the installment of an uncouth, dysgenic rabble that is more easily ruled over, the New World Order wants boots on the ground, a large impoverished workforce that will fall in line — third world African and Arab migrants offer this.
The imposition of the third world (generally poorer genes) on the first world (generally better genes) by force, under the cover of a hard-fought establishment propaganda campaign claiming "integration" and "assimilation" can happen between racial groups of greatly differing intelligence (it can't, by the way) — combined with the safety net of welfare guarantees, means the proliferation of bad genetics — I predict this will soon mean the average person's IQ will be 20 IQ points lower than it currently is in the Western world within the next century.
Nature naturally classifies itself implicitly; nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters, and capacities — elite-funded social justice is attempting to bury this truth; that inequality is inherent in nature and is inevitable whether we like it or not — those in power know this, their social campaigns have had us forget that "equality" is a farce, only they benefit from "equality" — allowing different incompatible groups equal say is asking for tribalism to take hold, making it easy for picking apart with sensationalist rhetoric and demagoguery in the democratic process, diversity is balkanisation of the electorate with the media pitching the groups against one another, rich versus poor, black versus white, man versus woman — any modicum of reason is lost in the process.
They claim the African is just "oppressed", never given his chance to shine — they blame the white man for oppressing the other races, when it was just nature taking its course. The strong, naturally, found their way to dominance — the weak faded away, or took on a lesser role.
“The earth continues to go round, whether it's the man who kills the tiger or the tiger who eats the man. The stronger asserts his will, it's the law of nature." — Adolf Hitler
It harms the best of us, and emboldens the weakest; forced "equality" is forced redistribution, a way of keeping a homogeneous underclass, and its overlords' positions, intact — because of this, it comes down to how we can best practically mitigate inequality in nature in a sensible way — a comprehensive eugenics program should be important in ensuring the biological stratification of humans doesn't become yet more divergent and yet more damaging to collective human freedoms, civility, and intelligence — any given society is the average of its individuals, do we want to pursue a Western world populated by below average individuals (who are allowed to vote, by the way). Is it wise to degrade the average individual? I don't think so.
Our negligent allowance of the mass importation and subsidization of poor genetics while knowing that these people know nothing of freedoms, nothing of human rights, nothing of free press, basic liberties and so on (they don't seem to value them, either) — and, they are living apart from those who could influence them positively; their ignorance is being preserved and legitimized, they pass on nothing of value to the new generations that will follow; the third world social bubble ensues.
How will it vote? How will it shape the West? Will it stand firm in individuality, or cave to crony collectivism? I think most of us can see the collision course in motion.
How is the new ~80 IQ model citizen created?
80 IQ point average is an optimistic number.
To find the new average IQ, just draw up the average recorded scores of the major ethnic groups arriving in the current "migrant crisis" P.S. it's called a "migrant crisis" to hide the fact it is completely orchestrated.
The newly introduced groups will settle and proliferate faster than native Caucasian populations and rise to demographic prominence.
Conversely, native Caucasians will either engage in miscegenation, or dwindle due to the falling white birthrate, compounded by organised social and toxicological affronts to white fertility.
Let's look at this graph; the major countries of migrant origin include Syria, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Albania, Iraq, Eritrea, Serbia, Pakistan, Ukraine, Nigeria, Somalia, Russia, Macedonia, Gambia, Iran, Bangladesh, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Senegal.
The non inter-European migrants are mostly Arabian and African in origin, both of these regions have a combined average biological IQ in the 70-80 region, as a previous article outlined; that's barely functional in society, literally baseline functionality.
Some of the most oppressive and thoroughly corrupt regimes have been in countries of races maladjusted to holding such power to account.
In the West — there is corruption, I'm not denying it.
But it is largely held at bay by an inquisitive, constitutionally switched-on populace, the West is more free than anywhere else for that reason alone — why else is it the premier global migrant destination? Because the people have defended their rights to property, to free speech, to self-determination — albeit not their banking systems and many areas and decisions of their government.
It's the last holdout of liberty and true individual prosperity in the world.
Causes of national differences? (Mostly) genes.
Sources: refer to this webpage.
Ultimately a slave underclass forming the bulk of voters will mean liberties being chipped away faster, wage and living standards dropping big time, and an overall regression into the serfdom seen in previous eras.
The crucial voices of the reasonable will be drowned out. Full-on mob rule will take hold — the prospects for a continued orderly and rational civilization will die with the emergence of this mutating mob as it sinks its talons into the very things that uphold Western civilization; not realizing that in myopically seizing these things, it will come to destroy them too. When you come from a place of barbarism, you grab at what you can and hold tight, you don't think about the wider picture, especially with bad genetics it makes things yet harder.
To look at at on an individual basis is too short-sighted, it's like saying "let's allow the third world to flood into Europe and assess them all as individuals" — ah, by which time the vast bulk of the deviant swathes have established themselves as parasites and run rampant. It's impractical to be too liberal on matters like this; a meritocratic, and most importantly pragmatic immigration policy is needed, a migrant comes to work, they have a purpose here, they are assessed on their qualifications and due placement in wider society — to accept a large group from a region known for its poor genetics and third world tendencies and to hope to assess them all as "individuals" is a pipe dream.
There must be compromise, sometimes absolute acts are necessary to solve partial issues.
Today's open-door migrant policy-makers know very well that most of the third world migrants won't be employed, will disproportionately commit the most crime, will disproportionately be welfare claimants; the statistics prove it (e.g. all available studies find that non-European immigrants to Britain cost about $10 billion/year).
Thus the authorities duck away when asked to list the background of migrant criminals, the media preaches how it is "irrelevant" to question the demographics behind society's major negative trends.
Mass migration is not about economics, or even assisting an ageing Europe (pro-natal policies can easily amend that) this is about replacement, nothing less — the installment of an uncouth, dysgenic rabble that is more easily ruled over, the New World Order wants boots on the ground, a large impoverished workforce that will fall in line — third world African and Arab migrants offer this.
The imposition of the third world (generally poorer genes) on the first world (generally better genes) by force, under the cover of a hard-fought establishment propaganda campaign claiming "integration" and "assimilation" can happen between racial groups of greatly differing intelligence (it can't, by the way) — combined with the safety net of welfare guarantees, means the proliferation of bad genetics — I predict this will soon mean the average person's IQ will be 20 IQ points lower than it currently is in the Western world within the next century.
Nature naturally classifies itself implicitly; nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters, and capacities — elite-funded social justice is attempting to bury this truth; that inequality is inherent in nature and is inevitable whether we like it or not — those in power know this, their social campaigns have had us forget that "equality" is a farce, only they benefit from "equality" — allowing different incompatible groups equal say is asking for tribalism to take hold, making it easy for picking apart with sensationalist rhetoric and demagoguery in the democratic process, diversity is balkanisation of the electorate with the media pitching the groups against one another, rich versus poor, black versus white, man versus woman — any modicum of reason is lost in the process.
They claim the African is just "oppressed", never given his chance to shine — they blame the white man for oppressing the other races, when it was just nature taking its course. The strong, naturally, found their way to dominance — the weak faded away, or took on a lesser role.
“The earth continues to go round, whether it's the man who kills the tiger or the tiger who eats the man. The stronger asserts his will, it's the law of nature." — Adolf Hitler
It harms the best of us, and emboldens the weakest; forced "equality" is forced redistribution, a way of keeping a homogeneous underclass, and its overlords' positions, intact — because of this, it comes down to how we can best practically mitigate inequality in nature in a sensible way — a comprehensive eugenics program should be important in ensuring the biological stratification of humans doesn't become yet more divergent and yet more damaging to collective human freedoms, civility, and intelligence — any given society is the average of its individuals, do we want to pursue a Western world populated by below average individuals (who are allowed to vote, by the way). Is it wise to degrade the average individual? I don't think so.
Our negligent allowance of the mass importation and subsidization of poor genetics while knowing that these people know nothing of freedoms, nothing of human rights, nothing of free press, basic liberties and so on (they don't seem to value them, either) — and, they are living apart from those who could influence them positively; their ignorance is being preserved and legitimized, they pass on nothing of value to the new generations that will follow; the third world social bubble ensues.
How will it vote? How will it shape the West? Will it stand firm in individuality, or cave to crony collectivism? I think most of us can see the collision course in motion.
How is the new ~80 IQ model citizen created?
80 IQ point average is an optimistic number.
To find the new average IQ, just draw up the average recorded scores of the major ethnic groups arriving in the current "migrant crisis" P.S. it's called a "migrant crisis" to hide the fact it is completely orchestrated.
The newly introduced groups will settle and proliferate faster than native Caucasian populations and rise to demographic prominence.
Conversely, native Caucasians will either engage in miscegenation, or dwindle due to the falling white birthrate, compounded by organised social and toxicological affronts to white fertility.
Let's look at this graph; the major countries of migrant origin include Syria, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Albania, Iraq, Eritrea, Serbia, Pakistan, Ukraine, Nigeria, Somalia, Russia, Macedonia, Gambia, Iran, Bangladesh, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Senegal.
The non inter-European migrants are mostly Arabian and African in origin, both of these regions have a combined average biological IQ in the 70-80 region, as a previous article outlined; that's barely functional in society, literally baseline functionality.
Some of the most oppressive and thoroughly corrupt regimes have been in countries of races maladjusted to holding such power to account.
- Look to China with its one-party system with elections now recently discontinued, the people live as slaves, subjected to extreme censorship laws and a brutal regime that will not hesitate to crush dissenters.
- Look to the nations of Africa, military dictatorships that have no civil order whatsoever; it's pretty much always been that way.
- South America is the same story, drug lords rule here, imperial Western interests hold big sway in agreement with the cartels.
- And so on...
In the West — there is corruption, I'm not denying it.
But it is largely held at bay by an inquisitive, constitutionally switched-on populace, the West is more free than anywhere else for that reason alone — why else is it the premier global migrant destination? Because the people have defended their rights to property, to free speech, to self-determination — albeit not their banking systems and many areas and decisions of their government.
It's the last holdout of liberty and true individual prosperity in the world.
Causes of national differences? (Mostly) genes.
Sources: refer to this webpage.
- Since the 20th century, there have been worldwide continual increases in measured IQ. This rise has been correlated with degrees of rising education levels, and as such may provide a partial explanation for observed differences in average IQ scores between nations. One recent study suggests that the Flynn effect has ended in some developed nations such as Denmark and Norway, and suggests that this is due to immigration from countries with lower education levels or due to changes in education policies within the countries. Wicherts et al. have suggested that national differences in IQ could be because African countries have not yet experienced the improvements that cause the Flynn effect in the developed world, such as improvements in nutrition and health, and educational attainment.
- Kanazawa writes that cold climate and harsh winters (the study uses mean annual temperature) as well as environment novelty (the study uses three different measures of distance from the ancestral environment in sub-Saharan Africa: ordinary distance and differences in latitudes and longitudes) have been proposed as important factors behind the genetic evolution of human intelligence. The study found independent support for both theories and argues that they together explain half to two-thirds of variance in national IQ. This study has been criticized by Wicherts et al. (2012) for multiple alleged flaws, including assuming that the Earth is flat, and that humans migrated in the most direct possible route, even if that route involved crossing the ocean. They conclude that these flaws "...should have precluded publication of the paper as constituted at the time of review."
- The sub-Saharan African IQ estimated from TIMSS studies from 72.4 to 65.9, rounded to 66.
- The present research found that the Muslim country mean IQ of 81 is half a standard deviation below the mean IQ of non-Muslim nations and is not related to strength of Muslim culture as defined by the percentage of Muslims in the country. The mean IQ of 84 in Arab countries is not associated with per capita income and is incompatible with the intellectual achievements of the golden age of the Muslim Empire. Possible explanations for this decline include hybridization with sub-Saharan Africans, dysgenic decrease in the more educated Muslims employing birth control as suggested by Meisenberg, the Muslim religion not fostering critical thinking, and the intellectual contributions being both exaggerated and made by non-Muslims.
- Wicherts, Borsboom, and Dolan (2010) criticized this and some other evolutionary studies for problems such as ignoring or assuming that the Flynn effect is equal worldwide and assuming that there have been no migrations and changes in climate over the course of evolution. "In addition, we show that national IQs are strongly confounded with the current developmental status of countries. National IQs correlate with all the variables that have been suggested to have caused the Flynn Effect in the developed world."
- Eppig, Fincher, and Thornhill (2010) states that distance from Africa, temperature, and most importantly by a large margin, prevalence of infectious disease predict national IQs. Education, literacy, GDP, and nutrition were not important as independent factors (however, the prevalence of infectious diseases is likely greatly affected by these factors). The authors argue that "From an energetics standpoint, a developing human will have difficulty building a brain and fighting off infectious diseases at the same time, as both are very metabolically costly tasks" and that "the Flynn effect may be caused in part by the decrease in the intensity of infectious diseases as nations develop."
- Becker and Rindermann (2016) found a moderate correlation between genetic distances, particularly with respect to geographic latitude, and cross-national IQ differences, even when controlled for factors such as Human Development Index, indicating an evolutionary explanation. Woodley of Menie et al. (2016) found that the frequencies of eight SNPs predictive of IQ correlated negatively with national fertility, and furthermore that the SNP meta-gene negatively predicts national fertility when HDI is controlled, "suggesting the existence of a selection pressure" that may reduce global g by 0.253 points per decade.
Ultimately a slave underclass forming the bulk of voters will mean liberties being chipped away faster, wage and living standards dropping big time, and an overall regression into the serfdom seen in previous eras.
The crucial voices of the reasonable will be drowned out. Full-on mob rule will take hold — the prospects for a continued orderly and rational civilization will die with the emergence of this mutating mob as it sinks its talons into the very things that uphold Western civilization; not realizing that in myopically seizing these things, it will come to destroy them too. When you come from a place of barbarism, you grab at what you can and hold tight, you don't think about the wider picture, especially with bad genetics it makes things yet harder.
Sunday, 29 July 2018
Brexit Derangement Hysteria Reaches New Levels
The strongly anti-Brexit, hyper-centralized mainstream media has come back with a new wave of fear mongering while toting the "possibility of a second referendum", as a "dreaded no-deal scenario" comes closer. It seems likely that the no-deal Brexit scenario won't happen — Theresa May, under pressure by the Masonic deep state, will likely keep us tied to European treaties, unless her cabinet keeps up the pressure. Several key pro-Brexit ministerial resignations suggests that May has veered towards upending the Brexit process.
The truth is, the UK in the EU is part of a socialist political, social, and economic redistribution and restructuring process that spreads resources across Europe, bolstering a single "European" entity under a bureaucratic and unelected government in Brussels. It's goal is anti national representation and pro-bloc representation. No single nation is allowed to become too powerful, bureaucratic red tape is laden across anything and everything to disadvantage stronger nations and bolster the weaker, all the while Brussels holds all the influence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2i2MY1U4rg
The EU was and is solely an avenue designed to abolish nationhood and form a superstate; big chunks of the British economy are taken to bail out other failing nation states, fund them, and prop them up.
"No erosion of essential national sovereignty", that was the promise to the UK upon entering the EEC in 1973. This promise has been broken.
The whole arrangement is protectionist while it backdoor floods European nations with rootless third world migrants who will vote to further consolidate European power and erode national identities — the goal being to plummet labor costs and create the next China or India, making Europe an economic powerhouse at the expense of the living standards of the average person.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLp7LtXmy68
The media is revving up the propaganda machine and pre-programming the general public into passively accepting a "half-in, half-out" deal which will keep the UK essentially tied to the EU, they do this by putting out material that is extremely negative about the situation to get people's minds more accustomed to a soft Brexit.
After the new Brexit minister Dominic Raab (now unsurprisingly sidelined by May) claimed that the UK would "thrive" in a no-deal scenario; the media has moved in to redress the narrative — with the aforementioned hysterics.
Jacob Rees-Mogg called the renewed anti-Brexit push "Project Fear on speed", adding: "It is a fallacy that countries will unilaterally decide to stop selling you their goods." (The EU doesn't have federal assent, yet, to impose something like that).
"The idea that food will not get through at Dover is entirely wrong" said Rees-Mogg,
"We would be free to import food, medicines, fuel as we wished and the EU could only stop this if it were to impose sanctions, which is not a credible thought."
Newly elected populist leader, Matteo Salvini stated that “My experience in the European parliament tells me you either impose yourself or they swindle you,” alluding to Theresa May's forgoing approach to negotiations.
Salvini, who recently advocated a "League of Leagues" to unite EU govts aiming to 'defend their borders', stated that he "will tour capital cities, and not just European ones, to create an alternative to this Europe founded on exploitation... [and] mass immigration."
Back to Brexit.
So, what has the media concocted this time? Well...
The hysteria is obvious — what is equally clear is that the UK's assets, economic power, and global influence is tangible, undeniable, and speaks for itself in, or out, of the EU — empty rhetoric, on the other hand, has led many to forget this reality.
If you're in any doubt about the UK's situation post-Brexit as the UK moves from EU vassalage arrangements to proper international agreements, read this article for an alternative, more sober take.
The truth is, the UK in the EU is part of a socialist political, social, and economic redistribution and restructuring process that spreads resources across Europe, bolstering a single "European" entity under a bureaucratic and unelected government in Brussels. It's goal is anti national representation and pro-bloc representation. No single nation is allowed to become too powerful, bureaucratic red tape is laden across anything and everything to disadvantage stronger nations and bolster the weaker, all the while Brussels holds all the influence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2i2MY1U4rg
The EU was and is solely an avenue designed to abolish nationhood and form a superstate; big chunks of the British economy are taken to bail out other failing nation states, fund them, and prop them up.
"No erosion of essential national sovereignty", that was the promise to the UK upon entering the EEC in 1973. This promise has been broken.
The whole arrangement is protectionist while it backdoor floods European nations with rootless third world migrants who will vote to further consolidate European power and erode national identities — the goal being to plummet labor costs and create the next China or India, making Europe an economic powerhouse at the expense of the living standards of the average person.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLp7LtXmy68
The media is revving up the propaganda machine and pre-programming the general public into passively accepting a "half-in, half-out" deal which will keep the UK essentially tied to the EU, they do this by putting out material that is extremely negative about the situation to get people's minds more accustomed to a soft Brexit.
After the new Brexit minister Dominic Raab (now unsurprisingly sidelined by May) claimed that the UK would "thrive" in a no-deal scenario; the media has moved in to redress the narrative — with the aforementioned hysterics.
Jacob Rees-Mogg called the renewed anti-Brexit push "Project Fear on speed", adding: "It is a fallacy that countries will unilaterally decide to stop selling you their goods." (The EU doesn't have federal assent, yet, to impose something like that).
"The idea that food will not get through at Dover is entirely wrong" said Rees-Mogg,
"We would be free to import food, medicines, fuel as we wished and the EU could only stop this if it were to impose sanctions, which is not a credible thought."
Newly elected populist leader, Matteo Salvini stated that “My experience in the European parliament tells me you either impose yourself or they swindle you,” alluding to Theresa May's forgoing approach to negotiations.
Salvini, who recently advocated a "League of Leagues" to unite EU govts aiming to 'defend their borders', stated that he "will tour capital cities, and not just European ones, to create an alternative to this Europe founded on exploitation... [and] mass immigration."
Back to Brexit.
So, what has the media concocted this time? Well...
- Super-gonorrhoea could spread more rapidly if the UK leaves the European Union, health chiefs have warned.
- Britain will have to stockpile food and medicine, the Army may have to be deployed to supply remote areas, aeroplanes will be grounded.
- Brexit poses a “threat to sandwiches”.
- Boss of Amazon warns of "civil unrest" in no-deal scenario.
- 'Prepare for the worst' in case of a no-deal Brexit.
- Amber Rudd comparing eurosceptics to climate change deniers.
The hysteria is obvious — what is equally clear is that the UK's assets, economic power, and global influence is tangible, undeniable, and speaks for itself in, or out, of the EU — empty rhetoric, on the other hand, has led many to forget this reality.
If you're in any doubt about the UK's situation post-Brexit as the UK moves from EU vassalage arrangements to proper international agreements, read this article for an alternative, more sober take.
Tuesday, 17 July 2018
Psilocybin: The Answer To Mental Illness
Psychoactive entheogenic compounds such as psilocybin, which is present in 200 species of mushrooms, is a substance already naturally present in the matter of the human mind.
Of course, entheogenic compounds are suppressed by the pharmaceutical industry "studies" and sanctioned against by the powers-that-be; naturally occurring substances cannot be patented or reliably centralized as they occur in nature.
The decentralization of the human mind.
If entheogenic compounds became mainstream for medicinal use, the very lucrative psychology & counseling industry would go bust (or take a big hit), the huge SSRI drug industry (worth 16.8 billion dollars by 2020) would go under, not to mention that psilocybin can erase the effects of brainwashing by erasing fears and anxiety, boosting empathy and assisting to dissolve negative phenotypical neurological imprints; thus pushing back many years of costly social engineering — the shadow government's worst nightmare is the decentralization of the human mind.
Works like a "surgical intervention".
Yes, really. A five-year study of the drug suggests it could work "like a surgical intervention" for mental illness.
Other psychedelics, such as DMT, also have a similar effect in reforming priorly ingrained neural structures, an article from Reset.me states:
https://youtu.be/EDYctenkgJo
The architecture of trauma in the brain.
If you are attacked by a dog as a child, for example, your brain might automatically associate the experience with any canine encounter, causing you to fear dogs for the rest of your life. “We might even react adversely to a distant bark,” the film states. Even if you can logically recognize that every dog is not going to be a threat, your initial reaction could still be one of programmed fear. And if events are repeated with the same result, the patterns only reinforce their connections, building up like scar tissue.
That’s where psychedelics can help. “Ayahuasca hyperactivates the entire brain region where we store and process emotional memory, often uncovering long-forgotten memories,” the video says. “This hyperactivation enables the conscious part of the new brain to temporarily override previously entrenched patterns, allowing new connections to be made.”
Memories can then be reevaluated and experiences addressed with more distance from the reflexive reactions to previous trauma. For example, an ayahuasca journey could allow the person who is afraid of dogs to break the fear’s hold on their brain and move past the negative encounter.
“Ayahuasca users typically describe having emerged with new perspectives on past experiences and deeply rooted patterns of behavior,” the film concludes.
Similarly in psilocybin, brain-imaging studies have shown that the substance targets areas of the brain overactive in depression.
In depressed or traumatized people the connections between brain circuits in the "sense-of-self" region are too strong, the neurology is warped and they become dysfunctional, as the brain is an adaptive organ — under certain traumas it rewires itself into a rut, for some people fetal trauma means they live their lives accustomed to a personality and social attachment style that is maladjusted.
Psychedelics loosen these "sense-of-self", overly self-conscious neural connections and create new ones and/or restore lost connections — psilocybin could provide intense relief and change the neural infrastructure from one of imbalanced self-defeat, to one of renewed balance.
[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="645"]
Psilocybin boosts connectivity in many areas of the brain while slowing down areas associated with depression and stress. Graph illustrates.[/caption]
The Lancet reported that psilocybin mushrooms were able to lift the severe depression of all twelve human volunteer participants, even though they had been struggling with the disease for an average of over seventeen years and despite that fact that none of the subjects had found relief with multiple rounds of standard anti-depressant medication.
This is a powerful substance that has the ability to totally shift human perception.
It's no coincidence that many users of psilocybin often claim to see the world completely differently post-use.
I spoke to one psilocybin user who claimed the following:
Of course, entheogenic compounds are suppressed by the pharmaceutical industry "studies" and sanctioned against by the powers-that-be; naturally occurring substances cannot be patented or reliably centralized as they occur in nature.
The decentralization of the human mind.
If entheogenic compounds became mainstream for medicinal use, the very lucrative psychology & counseling industry would go bust (or take a big hit), the huge SSRI drug industry (worth 16.8 billion dollars by 2020) would go under, not to mention that psilocybin can erase the effects of brainwashing by erasing fears and anxiety, boosting empathy and assisting to dissolve negative phenotypical neurological imprints; thus pushing back many years of costly social engineering — the shadow government's worst nightmare is the decentralization of the human mind.
Works like a "surgical intervention".
Yes, really. A five-year study of the drug suggests it could work "like a surgical intervention" for mental illness.
Other psychedelics, such as DMT, also have a similar effect in reforming priorly ingrained neural structures, an article from Reset.me states:
https://youtu.be/EDYctenkgJo
“When any stimulus enters the brain, the brain tries to understand it based on previous experiences,” the video says. “This pattern is like a shortcut, activated every time we face a similar situation.” That’s why trauma or other powerful events can make such an impact when they occur early in life.
The architecture of trauma in the brain.
If you are attacked by a dog as a child, for example, your brain might automatically associate the experience with any canine encounter, causing you to fear dogs for the rest of your life. “We might even react adversely to a distant bark,” the film states. Even if you can logically recognize that every dog is not going to be a threat, your initial reaction could still be one of programmed fear. And if events are repeated with the same result, the patterns only reinforce their connections, building up like scar tissue.
That’s where psychedelics can help. “Ayahuasca hyperactivates the entire brain region where we store and process emotional memory, often uncovering long-forgotten memories,” the video says. “This hyperactivation enables the conscious part of the new brain to temporarily override previously entrenched patterns, allowing new connections to be made.”
Memories can then be reevaluated and experiences addressed with more distance from the reflexive reactions to previous trauma. For example, an ayahuasca journey could allow the person who is afraid of dogs to break the fear’s hold on their brain and move past the negative encounter.
“Ayahuasca users typically describe having emerged with new perspectives on past experiences and deeply rooted patterns of behavior,” the film concludes.
Similarly in psilocybin, brain-imaging studies have shown that the substance targets areas of the brain overactive in depression.
In depressed or traumatized people the connections between brain circuits in the "sense-of-self" region are too strong, the neurology is warped and they become dysfunctional, as the brain is an adaptive organ — under certain traumas it rewires itself into a rut, for some people fetal trauma means they live their lives accustomed to a personality and social attachment style that is maladjusted.
Psychedelics loosen these "sense-of-self", overly self-conscious neural connections and create new ones and/or restore lost connections — psilocybin could provide intense relief and change the neural infrastructure from one of imbalanced self-defeat, to one of renewed balance.
[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="645"]
Psilocybin boosts connectivity in many areas of the brain while slowing down areas associated with depression and stress. Graph illustrates.[/caption]The Lancet reported that psilocybin mushrooms were able to lift the severe depression of all twelve human volunteer participants, even though they had been struggling with the disease for an average of over seventeen years and despite that fact that none of the subjects had found relief with multiple rounds of standard anti-depressant medication.
This is a powerful substance that has the ability to totally shift human perception.
It's no coincidence that many users of psilocybin often claim to see the world completely differently post-use.
I spoke to one psilocybin user who claimed the following:
"I have social anxiety but now there has been an increase in my comfort level while conversing with other people. I tend to be pessimistic and self-averse, but lately optimism and self-compassion have been major themes in my perception."
Thursday, 24 May 2018
Richard Hall Reveals Strange Findings On Jo Cox Murder
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEIoLftYYLM
Richard Hall from Richplanet TV recently released a video detailing some strange and interesting findings on Jo Cox's murder in 2016 in the run up to the UK's Brexit vote.
Here's the video description:
Richard Hall from Richplanet TV recently released a video detailing some strange and interesting findings on Jo Cox's murder in 2016 in the run up to the UK's Brexit vote.
Here's the video description:
When the Jo Cox assassination occurred in June 2016, many questions were raised over the veracity of the official version of events. Some say the trial was staged and the outcome preordained by mainstream media. Richard has met with first hand witnesses to the events and has met with friends of the alleged perpetrator Tommy Mair. In this lecture Richard presents the findings of his independent investigation to date. He is appealing for viewers to go to their MP and show them his lecture on Jo Cox's murder. Richard clearly demonstrates that the trial was at the very least a farce, and quite possibly 100% fraudulent. The mainstream media (as usual) were used to sell to the public an entirely false motive for the murder. Anyone with more information please contact Richard in confidence via the contact page on the Richplanet website.
Sunday, 8 April 2018
Chemical Attack: Russia Warns Of 'Grave' Response If US Launches Strike on Syria
The Russian Defense Ministry immediately denied and dismissed the US allegations that the Syrian government was responsible for the chemical attack in Eastern Ghouta's Douma.
Major General Yury Yevtushenko, head of the Reconciliation Center in Syria, said on Sunday; "We strongly refute this information,"
"We declare our readiness, after Douma is liberated from the militants, to immediately send Russian radiation, chemical and biological protection specialists to collect data that will confirm the fabricated nature of these allegations,"
Yevtushenko said that "a number of Western countries" are trying to prevent the resumption of an operation aimed at driving militants from the city of Douma.
"For this purpose, the use of chemical weapons by Syrian government forces – one of the most widespread claims in the West – is being used," he added.
And, knowing where this is all headed, Russia’s Foreign Ministry says in statement on website that reports of chemical weapons attack in rebel-held town of Douma are fabricated, and any military operations against Syria on false pretenses may lead to “gravest consequences,”
https://twitter.com/LizSly/status/982978675946803200?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fnews%2F2018-04-08%2Ftrump-threatens-assad-putin-over-syrian-chemical-attack-russia-warns-gravest&tfw_site=zerohedge
The Russians added that "The goal of such reports is to aid terrorists and justify possible military strikes from outside Syria."
Russia is correct, and it is now just a matter of time before Trump unveils his next grand diversion from the chaos at home and the trade war with China, by launching another 50 or so Tomahawks at some venue deep inside Syria, in a carbon copy repeat of what happened exactly one year ago.
Major General Yury Yevtushenko, head of the Reconciliation Center in Syria, said on Sunday; "We strongly refute this information,"
"We declare our readiness, after Douma is liberated from the militants, to immediately send Russian radiation, chemical and biological protection specialists to collect data that will confirm the fabricated nature of these allegations,"
Yevtushenko said that "a number of Western countries" are trying to prevent the resumption of an operation aimed at driving militants from the city of Douma.
"For this purpose, the use of chemical weapons by Syrian government forces – one of the most widespread claims in the West – is being used," he added.
And, knowing where this is all headed, Russia’s Foreign Ministry says in statement on website that reports of chemical weapons attack in rebel-held town of Douma are fabricated, and any military operations against Syria on false pretenses may lead to “gravest consequences,”
https://twitter.com/LizSly/status/982978675946803200?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fnews%2F2018-04-08%2Ftrump-threatens-assad-putin-over-syrian-chemical-attack-russia-warns-gravest&tfw_site=zerohedge
The Russians added that "The goal of such reports is to aid terrorists and justify possible military strikes from outside Syria."
Russia is correct, and it is now just a matter of time before Trump unveils his next grand diversion from the chaos at home and the trade war with China, by launching another 50 or so Tomahawks at some venue deep inside Syria, in a carbon copy repeat of what happened exactly one year ago.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)