Understanding the Christchurch Shooting & Manifesto

The Australian man Brenton Tarrant's racially and politically motivated shooting in Christchurch New Zealand coincided with the Roman Ides of March (15th March), a day used by the Romans as a deadline for settling debts.

It was the day Julius Caesar was assassinated in 44 BC, and was a pivotal moment in the Roman Empire's history — Tarrant's "debt collection" was attributed mainly to avenging the 2017 death of 11-year-old Ebba Åkerlund, who was plowed down by a HGV at the hands of an Islamic terrorist.

"...That difference was Ebba Åkerlund. Young, innocent and dead Ebba."

— Tarrant's Manifesto "The Great Replacement", on why he committed the acts.

The Christchurch shooting left 50 dead, and many injured. The bought-out media - of course - has plastered every outlet with condemnation for the eminent threat of far-right "white supremacist" extremism - such coverage being many magnitudes greater than coverage of similar, and far more numerous Islamic fundamentalist atrocities against Europeans.

Most recently, the Hillary Clinton & Barack Obama among others, covered up the massive attack on Christians by using the vague term "Easter worshippers". Both Hillary and Obama identified Muslim victims directly and honestly in similar attacks.

The so far 359-death Sri Lanka attack was carried out by ISIS on 21st April 2019 - the Islamic terrorists that claimed to be ISIS, "carried out (the attack) in retaliation for a March attack on two mosques in New Zealand".

Racial and national determinism is celebrated in more or less all non-Western countries. Jews can practice ethnic and national determinism, as seen in modern Israel as the "homeland" for the Jewish people, China can do the same for the ethnic Chinese, there was no media outcry for the racially motivated pogroms against whites in South Africa. Minority groups in the West are acknowledged by the Marxist leftist institutions as groups with identities - the whites are, for the most part, not.

This is sinister and deliberate cultural Marxism. This is the great blatant hypocrisy of our time.

The targeted Mosque had links to radical Islam.

A previous investigation revealed that the Mosque that was targeted had hosted speakers which encouraged active engagement of violence in the struggle of jihad against the infidels.

Stuff.co.nz:

Jones was killed alongside Australian Christopher Havard, whose parents said he was introduced to radical Islam at the Al-Noor mosque in Christchurch.

Mosque leaders confirmed Havard stayed there and studied in 2011, but denied radical teaching took place. But a man who attended a converts’ weekend at the mosque 10 years ago said a visiting speaker from Indonesia talked about violent jihad and plenty shared his views. “Most of the men were angry with the moral weakness of New Zealand. I would say they were radical.”

British political activist and the author of The Fall of Western Man, Mark Collett posted on Twitter:

"When 22 people, mainly young girls, were killed by a Muslim suicide bomber at Manchester Arena, people sang 'Don't Look Back in Anger' & were told not to blame 'groups' for the actions of one. Will people be singing that song today, or will the media be singing a different tune?"

European advocacy think tank VertigoPolitix tweeted:

"According to many sources, including the UN, some 90,000+ Christians were murdered last year worldwide by Muslim fundamentalists. Not a single report on CNN, nor a brief newscast on the subject by any entity in the media. That's 250 Christians murdered every day. Just silence..."

The mainstream media has failed to present balanced coverage of the fact that this is clearly a one-sided conflict in terms of numbers — according to the "What makes Islam so different?" website; 859 people were killed and 844 injured in "killings in the name of Islam" in the past 30 days alone. Can the same be said for Christians? That doesn't even account for the huge death toll of European innocents at the hands of Islamic terror in the past bloody decade.

It also doesn't account for the astronomical figures of shady "collateral" civilian Muslim deaths in the middle east at the hands of neoconservative foreign policies seeking to wrest control of the region - using mass displacement, starvation & disease (as seen in Yemen), and the bombing of civilian buildings to pressure the administrations of target regimes to buckle and break.

The Tarrant Manifesto.

The shooter, besides recording the entire event with a GoPro, also wrote a short, albeit compelling manifesto - which he uploaded with the video, titled "The Great Replacement" - likely inspired by the writings of French writer, Renaud Camus, who first coined the term.

In this manifesto, its contents informed "over a great deal of time, from a great deal of places", Tarrant expresses support for the conservative policies of the People's Republic of China (PRC). He criticizes the "milquetoast", cosmopolitan leaders of Europe, also discussing the leftist's "long march through the institutions" among many other topics.

Tarrant's principal goal was accelerationist; to trigger conflict along racial, political, and social lines - especially through inflaming the gun debate in the United States, possibly triggering conflict. He states that "only in times of radical change and social discomfort can great and terrific change occur", opposing the ineffective due processes that have been hijacked by the Jewish moneylender plutocracy.

"Democracy is mob rule and the mob itself is ruled by our enemies. The global and corporate run press controls them, the education system (long since fallen to the long march through the institutions carried out by the Marxists) controls them, the state (long since heavily lost to its corporate backers) controls them and the anti-white media machine controls them. Do not suffer under the delusion of an effortless, riskless democratic victory. Prepare for war, prepare for violence and prepare for risk, loss, struggle, death. Force is the only path to power and the only path to true victory."

Tarrant presented his actionable aims in bold subheadings with thought-provoking titles such as "destabilization and accelerationism: tactics for victory", "globalized capitalist markets are the enemy of racial autonomists", "NGOs are directly involved in the genocide of the European people", the harbinger's "it is never wise to become a minority group", the anti-democratic "there is no democratic solution", and the fiscally-minded "no taxes to anti-white States", among others.

"This solution of a Democratic salvation is nothing but a pipe dream, and as our enemies increase within our lands, driven by mass immigration and the invaders own higher birth rate it will be pushed further and further into the realms of impossibility."

His position as an "eco-fascist" in agreement with Sir Oswald Mosley’s views, seeks to abolish the laissez-faire nature of modern money-centric globalist economics and social order in turn for more morally, culturally, racially and environmentally conscious and autonomous European nation states.

"In the end human greed and the need for increasing profit margins of capital owners needs to be fought against and broken."

His proposed method is hyper-protectionism, distantly akin to the protectionism of the European Union, although far less globally-minded still, calling to "break the back of cheap labour", calling it "slave labour" and a force for denigrating meaningful advanced human societies:

"An environmentally conscious and moral society will never be able to economically compete with a society based on ever increasing industrialization, urbanization, industrial output and population increase. The cheaper labour and ignorance of environmental health will always result in cheaper goods produced with less effort and inevitably result in control of the market."

Tarrant also addresses the issues of the mass-proliferation of foreign populations in relation to the environment and world stability, positing an argument for white advocacy and ethno-nationalism, as opposed to seeing demographics as a purely financial tool in a race to seize the global markets.

Tarrant argues against modernity, arguing human stock ought to live meaningful lives guided by environmental consideration and social and moral principles of higher thought. Tarrant believed whites have demonstrated this capacity better than other groups:

"The environment is being destroyed by over population, we Europeans are one of the groups that are not over populating the world. The invaders are the ones over populating the world. Kill the invaders, kill the overpopulation and by doing so save the environment."

A more satirical side emerged in the manifesto, as Tarrant highlighted the fact Nelson Mandela had emerged a celebrated leader, politician and an icon of African ethnic and national identity following his similar acts of terrorism:

"I do not just expected to be released, but I also expect an eventual Nobel Peace prize. As was awarded to the Terrorist Nelson Mandela once his own people achieved victory and took power. I expect to be freed in 27 years from my incarceration, the same number of years as Mandela, for the same crime."

The WW1 Conspiracy

"If my sons did not want wars, there would be none." — Gutle Schnaper, Mayer Amschel Rothschild's wife.

Understanding why the World Wars were deliberately created.

Wars have always been the catalysts of massive change in human civilization since the dawn of time. Wars force people to grasp at security, to clamor for an answer in the midst of chaos, for when we are comfortable; we are complacent, rigid, and uncompromising, real change has most often come in times of desperation — hence "Order out of chaos", or "Ordo ab chao", a Masonic principle and motto of the 33rd degree of Scottish Rite Freemasonry. Such a term states the necessity of conflict in bringing forth order, and the interchangeability of what is "good", and what is "evil".

The chaos (CHAO) is the society we see around us today and it is the builders who influence the leaders to manufacture this chaos so that they can conceal their creations in darkness while they work towards the light (ORDO). Without chaos there would never be order. Without darkness, there can be no light and without light there can be no darkness. What is the "AS ABOVE", is the "SO BELOW" of this Secret Brotherhood.

The eminent banking families of the era knew this ancient principle, and swore by it (and still do):

They had (and still have) the influence to ignite major conflicts to set the scene for their brand of politics; the politics of globalization, and that is exactly what they did by funding all sides of the world wars. This was a time far more nationalistic than now, a time of many kings, not few, the real challenge of the secret Masonic Anglo-American order was conquering them all without firing a single shot of their own.

The great wars brought Europe to its knees and did away with the old order (shattering the strength of the Ottoman Empire, British Empire, Russians, Germans, etc) in exchange for the new order: the rise of the UN, the EU, and the European nations' financial and military dependence on the Masonic globalist bankers.

Political centralization was accelerated in the disguise of being a safeguard against another great war. Later on, the Soviet Union was funded and created as an excuse to keep these globalist political institutions in place.

The Soviets were the much needed "red terror" to unite the Western nations against — for fear is one of the most compelling emotions, a great dose of which kept European nationalism subdued and the globalist vision sustained right through to present times.

How it all began.

World War one, known as the "Great War" and, most infamously, "the war to end all wars", was one of the bloodiest conflicts in known human history. It all began with three influential men. Among some of the wealthiest individuals in British society:

1. William T. Stead — Major English newspaper editor who, as a pioneer of investigative journalism, became a controversial figure of the Victorian era.


2. Reginald Brett, aka Lord Esher — an éminence grise, a friend, confidante and adviser to Victoria, Edward VII, and George V. Known as one of the primary powers behind the throne of his era.


3. Cecil Rhodes — An enormously wealthy diamond magnate, visionary, and major Rothschild affiliate, whose exploits in South Africa and ambition to transform the African continent would earn him the nickname of "colossus".

Cecil Rhodes, who, with the Rothschild-Rhodes company, made an extortionate amount of money exploiting South Africans in the wildly profitable mining industry, would have the finances and links to start building a network of like-minded influential people prepared to further influence the course of modern history.

Rhodes was a pioneering advocate of globalization, saying of the English, "I contend that we are the first race in the world, and that the more of the world we inhabit the better it is for the human race. I contend that every acre added to our territory means the birth of more of the English race who otherwise would not be brought into existence."

Rhodes was open with his ambitions, an 1890 article entitled "Mr. Rhode's Ideal of Anglo-Saxon Greatness" was published by the aforementioned Mr. William T. Stead, who was a key publicist for Rhodes' ideals.

The article featured the stunning subhead; "He believed a wealthy secret society should work to secure the world's peace, and a British-American Federation."

"(The) Idea for the development of the English-speaking race was the foundation of 'a society copied, as to organization, from the Jesuits'."

"We could arrange with the present members of the United States Assembly and our House of Commons to achieve the peace of the world."

The article quotes Rhodes as saying:

"The only thing feasible to carry out this idea, is a secret society, gradually absorbing the wealth of the world."

Here are some videos from The Corbett Report, one of the most reputable, well-researched sources of independent media:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tclAbWvBt70

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-5kWX7rYuU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzVd7XCTu28

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yw0-ASR4sr8

Rhodes wanted to make the British Empire a superpower in which all of the British-dominated countries in the empire, including Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Cape Colony, would be represented in the British Parliament. Rhodes included American students as eligible for the Rhodes scholarships. He said that he wanted to breed an American elite of philosopher-kings who would have the United States rejoin the British Empire. As Rhodes also respected and admired the Germans and their Kaiser, he allowed German students to be included in the Rhodes scholarships. He believed that eventually the United Kingdom (including Ireland), the US, and Germany together would dominate the world and ensure perpetual peace.

After Cecil Rhodes.

Rhodes left a vast sum of money in his will after his death in 1902 to various influential confidantes, in the posthumous W. T Stead published "The Last Will and Testament" of 1902, Rhode's reasoning was outlined:

It stated that he lamented the loss of America from the British Empire and that they should formulate a secret society with the specific aim of bringing America back into the Empire. Then he lists all the countries he needs to include in this list to have world domination, to have an English-speaking union, to have British race as the enforced culture in all countries worldwide.

He sought support, funding, plans, his agenda was in place — his funds left to those he trusted, and soon after this WW1, WW2 and so forth occurred, modern history quickly took shape.

The Round Table Group.

After Rhode's death in 1902, this secret society revealed itself slightly, revealing itself as a force for world peace. Its modus operandi was imperialism, a secretive continuation of the open imperialism of previous centuries.

The Boer war was orchestrated to consolidate Rothschild power over the resources of South Africa.

Sir Alfred Milner, a close associate of Rhodes, was instrumental in igniting the Boer War:

"I precipitated the crisis, which was inevitable before it was too late. It is not very agreeable, and in many eyes, not a very creditable piece of business to have been largely instrumental in bringing about a war."

When W. T. Stead initially objected to the Boer War, Rhodes told him:

"You will support Milner in any measure that he may take short of war. I make no such limitation. I support Milner absolutely without reserve. If he says peace, I say peace; if he says war, I say war. Whatever happens, I say ditto to Milner."

Rising Germany & The Pre-WW1 Days.

German ascendance in geopolitical power in Europe threatened the Masonic hegemony and world vision, in order to crush the independence of the major European powers, with Germany's Kaiser being the most threatening, not to mention Russia's Tsar, it required a devastating war, that war would be WW1 and the Bolshevik revolution.

Lord Esher was a close confidante of the King, a monarch with a hands-on approach to foreign diplomacy and a disdain for the rise of German power, such a sentiment dovetailed perfectly in line with the group's aims. With insiders in Russia and France, the Triple Entente formed, the pincer that would crush Germany and, in the chaos of war, ruin the other major European nations.

In the run up to the war, the British press released story after story framing Germans as hostiles in every regard, bringing public perception in line with the goals of the master plan.

The British helped the Japanese in the 1904-05 war against Russia, another major national competitor. Japan turned to Cecil Rhodes' co-conspirator Lord Nathan Rothschild, who supplied them with munitions, copious funds, and denied the Russians access to the Suez canal and high-quality coal, which the British did provide to the Japanese. All this helped Japan win the war.

The Japanese fleet was even constructed in Britain, but these facts did not find their way into the Milner controlled press.

When the Russian navy accidentally fired on a British fishing ship in the north sea in 1904 the British public was outraged. The British foreign office, remarkably, tried to pin this incident on the Germans, triggering a press war between the British and the Germans.

Another aggrandizement came when there were (unsubstantiated) scares over the Germans seizing Morocco, an important trade route out of the Mediterranean, once again the media spun the story to make the Germans appear the aggressors.

The Beginning of WW1.

Eventually the elite got their way when Franz Ferdinand was shot, soon after this, the series of diplomatic and political traps were sprung, controversy engulfed the political class of Europe. Not long after this Europe was at war.

In retrospect, the machinations that led to this war are a masterclass in how power really operates in society. The military compacts that committed Britain and ultimately the world to war had nothing to do with elected parliaments or representative democracy.

When Conservative Prime Minister Arthur Balfour resigned in 1905, deft political manipulations ensured that members of The Round Table; including Herbert Henry Asquith, Edward Grey, and Richard Haldane; three men who liberal leader Henry Campbell-Bannerman privately accused of "Milner worship", seamlessly slid into key positions in the new liberal government, and continued the strategy of German encirclement without missing a step.

In fact, the details of Britain's military commitments to Russia and France, and even the negotiations themselves, were deliberately kept hidden from members of Parliament, and even members of the Cabinet who were not part of the secret society. It wasn't until November 1911, a full six years into the negotiations, that the Cabinet of Prime Minister Herbert Henry Asquith started to learn the details of these agreements; agreements that had been repeatedly and officially denied in the press and in Parliament.

The result of the first world war achieved the intended result; to simplify the world stage and do away with the once-powerful dynasties of old, creating a power vaccum for the new order.

Aftermath.

In the aftermath of the war, four empires disappeared: the German, Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman, and Russian. Four dynasties, together with their ancillary aristocracies, fell as a result of the war: the Romanovs, the Hohenzollerns, the Habsburgs, and the Ottomans. Yet one major dynasty still reigned supreme, the Rothschild dynasty and its affiliated ancillaries.

Soon after, the League of Nations was formed on 28 June 1919, which eventually became the UN, following WW2, this was taken yet further as the European Union was formed with a direct reference to avoiding massive war in Europe again. The EU's main website states "The European Union is set up with the aim of ending the frequent and bloody wars between neighbours, which culminated in the Second World War." Yet it was these massive wars that were ignited to justify such a political reformation.

The same dialectic was enacted with the "War on Terror" in recent times to justify intervention in places the world order desires to control. I see no ends to such deception so long as the eminent Western banking dynasties persist.