Have The British Royal Family Interbred With Jews?

From Inspire Change World & Alma.

For the last few years, I have been telling people that the British “Royal Family” are absolutely not as they seem. […] I have said that these people are absolutely not British in any aspect, but are criminals, frauds, and have absolutely no rights to the British throne at all..

Now, I want to reveal through an article from my friend, Whitewraithe, who writes the blog: Pragmatic Witness, that amazing article, entitled: “Britain’s Jewish Royal Family” right here for everyone to see for themselves, and I do, of course, have some additional thoughts and comments to follow:

Britain’s Jewish Royal Family

What we have been sold is no less than the groundwork for the imposition of a future Jewish Monarchy in Great Britain. And engineered by the House of Rothschild, whose relations and puppets on Wall Street and in the City of London are responsible for a deliberately created international financial crisis aimed at creating a one world currency system, a one world bank and a New World Order, one world government.

As one Royal insider commented “An insecure immigrant Royal family who have never felt at ease with the British people, and always more secure with immigrants and outsiders, and an alliance with the richest Jewish family in the world, heads of what is increasingly being re-Christened “The Jew World Order, who also seek to raise their status, is perceived by the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh as the best guarantor of their family’s future and safety. In short, we will one day see a Rothschild Royal family.”

Many people still cannot get Kate Middleton or why she, a supposed ‘commoner’ would marry Prince William. But hidden right under our noses is the truth the controlled mainstream media is hiding. Kate Middleton is a Jew from a maternal line of non-practicing, assimilated and poor Sephardic Jews aligned to the Church of England. Her mother whose maiden name is Goldsmith, practicing or not, is Jewish and under Jewish law if the mother is Jewish then the children are Jewish, therefore the children of Prince William will be legally Jewish….especially as William, under Judaic law, is also a Jew!

Under Jewish law if William and Kate have children their children will be Jews!

Princess Diana was a Jew because her mother was a Jew therefore Princes William and Harry:  See also: Huffington Post — A Jewish King And Queen Of England? It’s Possible

PRINCESS DIANA’S PARENTAL JEWISH LINEAGE:

In Tina Brown’s book ‘The Diana Chronicles’, the author claims that Princess Diana’s Jewish mother Frances Shand Kydd had a long-running affair with Sir James Goldsmith during her marriage to Earl Spencer. She suggests that Diana, who was born in 1961, was Goldsmith’s love child and not Spencer’s daughter. Even so the father’s line is irrelevant as Jewishness travels down the matriarchal line and Diana’s mother was a Jew. See also:  The Times of Israel —  Will the Future King of England Be Jewish?

The Goldschmidts, like their neighbors and relatives, the Rothschilds, had been prosperous merchant bankers in Frankfurt, Germany since the 16th century.(Wikipedia). In 1773, Mayer Rothschild invited Goldschmidt, (Goldsmith), Schiff, Oppenheimer, Warburg and eight other ambitious Jewish businessmen to his goldsmith shop. Together they formulated a long term plan […].

PRINCESS DIANA’S JEWISH SON AND FUTURE KING WILLIAM.

The original and current Jewish definition of a “born Jew” is a person whose mother is Jewish. Judaism is passed down in a matriarchal lineage. Prince William’s mother, Princess Diana, had a Jewish mother (Frances Ruth Burke Roche; a Rothschild) and she likely had a Jewish father (though his lineage would be irrelevant under Jewish law). That would make William – Jewish.

PRINCESS DIANA’S JEWISH HALF-BROTHERS

Diana shares a striking physical resemblance to the children of Sir James Goldsmith – Zak Goldsmith, Ben Goldsmith and Jemima Goldsmith. They are allegedly Diana’s half brothers and sister.

Following the Rothschild protocol of interbreeding to keep the power and wealth all-in-the-family, Diana’s alleged half brother Ben Goldsmith wed Kate Rothschild in 2003.

Princess Diana’s other alleged half brother, Zac Goldsmith, divorced his wife after he was elected British MP. He is now living with Alice Rothschild. This Rothschild-Goldsmith couple is also expected to marry.

Many people were perplexed why parliament should — recently, during one of it’s most busy sessions since the war –, have enacted a law allowing Catholics to ascend to the throne. What perplexed them was that the issue was not even on the horizon and there was simply no justification at that stage to use valuable parliamentary time dealing with it. In the light of this theory we can better speculate what was going on.  This was an ‘en Passant’ means of allowing Jews to take the throne on the basis of the ‘equality’ and ‘diversity’ our cultural Marxist Queen so greatly cherishes.

People have also always been mystified why Charles married Diana in the first place given that he was deeply in love with and had a long-standing relationship with Camilla Parker-Bowles. But that marriage made perfect sense if the family simply wanted Jewish children for a future Jewish monarchy. Whether the relationship lasted or not was of little importance once the the children were born and how convenient that Diana went the way of a wife of Henry the Eighth.

But the Kate-William marriage also perhaps explains Prince Charles’s dictum that, should he be ruler, he would seek a constitutional change that would remove him from sole governance of the Church of England to become the leader “Of all faiths.” Such a constitutional move would give Judaism parity with Christianity allowing a Jewish member of the Royal Family, for example, even if it were a woman, to ascend to the throne […].

And so the Rothschilds attended the royal wedding in more ways than one!

THE PLAN WAS THERE ALL ALONG, IN FRONT OF OUR UNCRITICAL, BRAINWASHED EYES

COMING OF THE MESSIAH.

However, the Talmud states that the leader of the world Jewish takeover would be a King, meaning that, should a male Jew ascend to the throne, such a King would then himself not only be the senior Elder of Zion but also the long awaited Messiah; The King of the Jews. As there are no remnants of the ancient Jewish royalty, and in order to fulfill the prophesy, Jewish royalty must be re-established, and it appears from this evidence that the current British Royal family has become the vehicle of choice.

At last, we come to understand the old Masonic claim that “Jerusalem will be rebuilded here, in England’s green and pleasant land.” The King of the Jews will rule the world from London where the ‘square mile’ of London City no longer belongs to the English people but was long ago sold to the Jews. His castle may well sit on the site of the last Olympic games; an area stolen by the state from the East Londoners who lived and worked there, perhaps in the long term for this very purpose.

Could the New Jerusalem be built in the ‘square-mile’ or could it be built on the Olympic site which was surrounded during the event by the Jewish and Masonic symbol of triangular, pyramid floodlights? Could the arena of the Olympic stadium become the site for the rebuilding of the temple? […]

On a related point, Royal rumour has it that Prince Harry was under great pressure, especially from the Queen, to marry Meghan Markle to help promote the racial genocide of the indigenous British people through mass immigration, cultural Marxism and Zioncorp promoted miscegenation.

A series of Jewish and far-left MPs such as Margaret Hodge, using mass third world immigration and fixed housing lists in the East End, have already succeeded in almost wiping out the Cockneys in this effort.

The Queen famously threatened in her 2010 Christmas Speech “The future face of Britain is the face of the Commonwealth.”

i.e.: The end of the white race in the United Kingdom!

Multiculturalism: For A Race That Will Accept Tyranny?

Rootless, spiritless underlings are desirable. A mestizo race of rootless cosmopolitan simpletons is the cultural-Marxist goal, in order to flood the West and balkanize the electorate to eradicate the voting power of those who still identify with their nation.

By introducing foreign groups with foreign propensities globalists can buy votes for their internationalist supranational brand of politics.

You also buy the apathetic, unintelligent genetics that will allow that internationalism to take hold and keep its grip; from there the globalist agenda is unclear — a nihilist consumer society, or one (eventually) guided by the principles of Luciferian Freemasonry, with all humankind under their boot?

This isn't a hypothetical conclusion - this is seen around the world in all nonwhite nations - the inhabitants and their unfavorable genetic behaviors and inclinations are being mass-imported into Europe as I write this. The EU is a sociopolitical welfare "paradise" designed to attract this mass immigration.

[caption id="attachment_16914" align="aligncenter" width="364"] Multiculturalism eliminates the races adapted in their own environments with their own cultures and customs. It destroys the vibrancy of true diversity; people living in their own nations with their own kind under their own laws and traditions.[/caption]

Asians/Indians are an ideal race for an underclass to be ruled over.

Asians/Indians (and to a lesser extent, Africans) are the best population to rule over if you're an Elite presiding over them. They have three major desirable traits to tyrants; passivity, lack of creativity, and moderate intelligence.

They have a proven record of being less resistant to tyranny — it's no coincidence that their cultures never birthed or maintained liberty, freedoms, and constitutionalism in any meaningful form whatsoever. So how can we expect them to uphold it in Europe? The answer is they likely will not only not do so, but due to their lacking social empathy — won't care to do so.

The People's Republic of China is a prime example of where tyranny has been allowed to flourish by a race of (mostly) gormless, submissive conformists, that lack the necessary creativity, general intelligence, and empathy to question, address, and maintain a healthy state and nation. Their conformity has assisted them though, as their in-group preference has been impenetrable to outside forces. While lacking creative faculties, the Chinese are intelligent enough to create a global industrial powerhouse, albeit at the expense of its workers' standard of living.

An example of racial advantage across national boundaries, as seen with Jews in the West - is in Indonesia, the Chinese Indonesian community make up 3% of the population, but control 70% of the economy.

In the Republic of India, similarly to China, a form of modern slavery is also in effect - people work long hours for barely any money - here, it is money, not wellbeing, that is the objective. An estimated IQ of Indians (from the subcontinent of India) living in the UK is 93, about 7 points below the average Briton. In India itself this figure is lower due to environmental reasons (lower standard of education, etc). Adding environmental factors; radiation, fluoridation, a sedentary lifestyle, additives, pesticides, vaccinations, chemtrailing, and brainwashing - and this figure is potentially lowered yet further.

These nonwhites are more easily exploited by multinational companies that disregard their quality of life, directly linked to their lower IQ - they fail to effectively unionize or ensure political systems defending individual rights. The Indians, as well as the Chinese, Africans and Arabs, generally accept this servitude - no glimmer of push-back or revolution as seen in France with the yellow vest movement. Nothing at all. They are at a lower state of consciousness, more firmly tied to the baseness of human animosity than whites.

Tyranny will reign over any nonwhite population. As evidenced around the world already.

Or, what whites consider "tyranny" is acceptable and tolerable to other races who don't generally practice values of liberty or constitutionalism.



The r-K selection theory is a theory which argues that different species face a trade-off between high rate of reproduction (r-strategy) and extensive care for their offspring (K-strategy). Humans may be the most K species of all.

J. Philippe Rushton applied r-K selection theory on human races and argued that human races differ regarding their degree K-strategy, which is argued to explain many racial differences.

He further argued that Europeans and East Asians evolved more toward a K-strategy than Africans because of a colder and more predictable climate and environment. Rushton argued that the survival challenges of making warm clothes, building durable shelter, preserving food, and strategically hunting large animals all selected genes for greater intelligence and social organization among the populations that migrated to cold climates.

Nonwhites tend to have no or few biological traits responsible for an expression of healthy individualism, as informed by a more K-selective profile — because of this, their version of sociological collectivism is inherently conducive to tyrannous rule — and allows a substantial measure of corruption to pervade their societies.

Some Asians are reasonably intelligent, but very susceptible to societal norms, they generally lack the useful "collective individualism" of the white man.

They are very passive and will tolerate a lot of nanny-statism. They're reasonably smart so you'll get enough people to man the high IQ positions in society like that of a surgeon and professor. But most of all they're happy to live in overcrowded cities in their shoebox apartments where they can content themselves with the latest gadgets and takeout.



They cram themselves into overstretched public transport and civil services. They work for peanuts and won't complain about paying obscenely high taxes, let alone ask where that money is going.

The bottom line: nonwhites are overwhelmingly apathetic, uncreative unquestioning consumers concerned with their immediate needs. Whites are questioning creative empaths and social gadflies; able to challenge systems, norms and institutions and have the foresight to make necessary amendments, having a more innate ability to effectively organize themselves.

[caption id="attachment_16913" align="aligncenter" width="629"] The typical rush hour in the Asian third world. In any self-respecting white nation there would be an uproar at such poor standards.[/caption]

A race that was forged under cold, scarce and other unfavorable environmental limitations is the only option for preserving freedoms and civilization.

The Nordic and Germanic white race are the single race forged most aptly under scarce conditions, their descendants have created nearly all in the world of note. Is it any wonder Germany is known as Das Land der Dichter und Denker (“the land of poets and thinkers”).

Their stock built the economic, social, and political systems and machinations that define the modern world. All races adapted to their environments, whether that was in body or mind or a mix of the two. But in the modern era the white man emerged as the most advantageous breed of hominid. It is undeniable that either the salvation of eugenicist policymaking is accepted, or the world slips back into the dark ages; a cluster of primitive warring states - until the graces of eugenicist evolutionary selection - or otherwise - enable a better course for human sensibility.

Their propensity for order, creativity and healthy individualism generated the most advanced society known to man; their track record is undeniable. It makes sense to be a white advocate.

The book "Human Accomplishment: The Pursuit of Excellence in the Arts and Sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950" stated that "Whether measured in people or events, 97 percent of accomplishment in the scientific inventories occurred in Europe and North America" (white people).

No whites, no civilization.

The IQ researcher Helmuth Nyborg wrote in 2012 that "The bleak situation is characteristic of the rest of Europe too, perhaps with Eastern Europe as an exception. [...] Ethnic Europeans will soon be wiped out of their own countries by this ever-expanding colossal demographic transition. Their national average IQs go down in the process, and when an average national IQ of 90 is reached, down go also their democracies and welfare. This also happens to European-Americans in the US. [...] To sum up, not only Denmark but Europe and the US get dumber by internal dysgenic decay and by northbound mass-immigration. This will have catastrophic consequences for Western democracy and welfare, but non-Western countries will also suffer. Unfortunately, most ruling (left- or right-oriented) Western leaders are not only seriously misguided by the illusion of equality but also blatantly ignorant of biological realities, so they can’t see the elephant in the room. They eventually will, but that will be beyond the point of no return."

Marxist-globalist Utopians think race-mixing will create human equality. It won't work as they envision it. 

Journalist Peter Hitchens once said that “The problem of utopia is that it can only be approached across a sea of blood, and you never arrive.”

Either Marxist-globalists want a slave class or they genuinely want to "guide human reproduction wisely", as stated on the Georgia Guidestones. The latter I'd prefer to the former. The outcome of their international experiment is yet to be fully seen, the prognosis is worrisome though.

Understanding the Christchurch Shooting & Manifesto

The Australian man Brenton Tarrant's racially and politically motivated shooting in Christchurch New Zealand coincided with the Roman Ides of March (15th March), a day used by the Romans as a deadline for settling debts.

It was the day Julius Caesar was assassinated in 44 BC, and was a pivotal moment in the Roman Empire's history — Tarrant's "debt collection" was attributed mainly to avenging the 2017 death of 11-year-old Ebba Åkerlund, who was plowed down by a HGV at the hands of an Islamic terrorist.

"...That difference was Ebba Åkerlund. Young, innocent and dead Ebba."

— Tarrant's Manifesto "The Great Replacement", on why he committed the acts.

The Christchurch shooting left 50 dead, and many injured. The bought-out media - of course - has plastered every outlet with condemnation for the eminent threat of far-right "white supremacist" extremism - such coverage being many magnitudes greater than coverage of similar, and far more numerous Islamic fundamentalist atrocities against Europeans.

Most recently, the Hillary Clinton & Barack Obama among others, covered up the massive attack on Christians by using the vague term "Easter worshippers". Both Hillary and Obama identified Muslim victims directly and honestly in similar attacks.

The so far 359-death Sri Lanka attack was carried out by ISIS on 21st April 2019 - the Islamic terrorists that claimed to be ISIS, "carried out (the attack) in retaliation for a March attack on two mosques in New Zealand".

Racial and national determinism is celebrated in more or less all non-Western countries. Jews can practice ethnic and national determinism, as seen in modern Israel as the "homeland" for the Jewish people, China can do the same for the ethnic Chinese, there was no media outcry for the racially motivated pogroms against whites in South Africa. Minority groups in the West are acknowledged by the Marxist leftist institutions as groups with identities - the whites are, for the most part, not.

This is sinister and deliberate cultural Marxism. This is the great blatant hypocrisy of our time.

The targeted Mosque had links to radical Islam.

A previous investigation revealed that the Mosque that was targeted had hosted speakers which encouraged active engagement of violence in the struggle of jihad against the infidels.

Stuff.co.nz:

Jones was killed alongside Australian Christopher Havard, whose parents said he was introduced to radical Islam at the Al-Noor mosque in Christchurch.

Mosque leaders confirmed Havard stayed there and studied in 2011, but denied radical teaching took place. But a man who attended a converts’ weekend at the mosque 10 years ago said a visiting speaker from Indonesia talked about violent jihad and plenty shared his views. “Most of the men were angry with the moral weakness of New Zealand. I would say they were radical.”

British political activist and the author of The Fall of Western Man, Mark Collett posted on Twitter:

"When 22 people, mainly young girls, were killed by a Muslim suicide bomber at Manchester Arena, people sang 'Don't Look Back in Anger' & were told not to blame 'groups' for the actions of one. Will people be singing that song today, or will the media be singing a different tune?"

European advocacy think tank VertigoPolitix tweeted:

"According to many sources, including the UN, some 90,000+ Christians were murdered last year worldwide by Muslim fundamentalists. Not a single report on CNN, nor a brief newscast on the subject by any entity in the media. That's 250 Christians murdered every day. Just silence..."

The mainstream media has failed to present balanced coverage of the fact that this is clearly a one-sided conflict in terms of numbers — according to the "What makes Islam so different?" website; 859 people were killed and 844 injured in "killings in the name of Islam" in the past 30 days alone. Can the same be said for Christians? That doesn't even account for the huge death toll of European innocents at the hands of Islamic terror in the past bloody decade.

It also doesn't account for the astronomical figures of shady "collateral" civilian Muslim deaths in the middle east at the hands of neoconservative foreign policies seeking to wrest control of the region - using mass displacement, starvation & disease (as seen in Yemen), and the bombing of civilian buildings to pressure the administrations of target regimes to buckle and break.

The Tarrant Manifesto.

The shooter, besides recording the entire event with a GoPro, also wrote a short, albeit compelling manifesto - which he uploaded with the video, titled "The Great Replacement" - likely inspired by the writings of French writer, Renaud Camus, who first coined the term.

In this manifesto, its contents informed "over a great deal of time, from a great deal of places", Tarrant expresses support for the conservative policies of the People's Republic of China (PRC). He criticizes the "milquetoast", cosmopolitan leaders of Europe, also discussing the leftist's "long march through the institutions" among many other topics.

Tarrant's principal goal was accelerationist; to trigger conflict along racial, political, and social lines - especially through inflaming the gun debate in the United States, possibly triggering conflict. He states that "only in times of radical change and social discomfort can great and terrific change occur", opposing the ineffective due processes that have been hijacked by the Jewish moneylender plutocracy.

"Democracy is mob rule and the mob itself is ruled by our enemies. The global and corporate run press controls them, the education system (long since fallen to the long march through the institutions carried out by the Marxists) controls them, the state (long since heavily lost to its corporate backers) controls them and the anti-white media machine controls them. Do not suffer under the delusion of an effortless, riskless democratic victory. Prepare for war, prepare for violence and prepare for risk, loss, struggle, death. Force is the only path to power and the only path to true victory."

Tarrant presented his actionable aims in bold subheadings with thought-provoking titles such as "destabilization and accelerationism: tactics for victory", "globalized capitalist markets are the enemy of racial autonomists", "NGOs are directly involved in the genocide of the European people", the harbinger's "it is never wise to become a minority group", the anti-democratic "there is no democratic solution", and the fiscally-minded "no taxes to anti-white States", among others.

"This solution of a Democratic salvation is nothing but a pipe dream, and as our enemies increase within our lands, driven by mass immigration and the invaders own higher birth rate it will be pushed further and further into the realms of impossibility."

His position as an "eco-fascist" in agreement with Sir Oswald Mosley’s views, seeks to abolish the laissez-faire nature of modern money-centric globalist economics and social order in turn for more morally, culturally, racially and environmentally conscious and autonomous European nation states.

"In the end human greed and the need for increasing profit margins of capital owners needs to be fought against and broken."

His proposed method is hyper-protectionism, distantly akin to the protectionism of the European Union, although far less globally-minded still, calling to "break the back of cheap labour", calling it "slave labour" and a force for denigrating meaningful advanced human societies:

"An environmentally conscious and moral society will never be able to economically compete with a society based on ever increasing industrialization, urbanization, industrial output and population increase. The cheaper labour and ignorance of environmental health will always result in cheaper goods produced with less effort and inevitably result in control of the market."

Tarrant also addresses the issues of the mass-proliferation of foreign populations in relation to the environment and world stability, positing an argument for white advocacy and ethno-nationalism, as opposed to seeing demographics as a purely financial tool in a race to seize the global markets.

Tarrant argues against modernity, arguing human stock ought to live meaningful lives guided by environmental consideration and social and moral principles of higher thought. Tarrant believed whites have demonstrated this capacity better than other groups:

"The environment is being destroyed by over population, we Europeans are one of the groups that are not over populating the world. The invaders are the ones over populating the world. Kill the invaders, kill the overpopulation and by doing so save the environment."

A more satirical side emerged in the manifesto, as Tarrant highlighted the fact Nelson Mandela had emerged a celebrated leader, politician and an icon of African ethnic and national identity following his similar acts of terrorism:

"I do not just expected to be released, but I also expect an eventual Nobel Peace prize. As was awarded to the Terrorist Nelson Mandela once his own people achieved victory and took power. I expect to be freed in 27 years from my incarceration, the same number of years as Mandela, for the same crime."